This is a bit about me! My name is Ivan Ofosu, and I am 19 years old and a freshman here at odu. I enjoy music, exercise, and overall having a good time! cybersecurity interests me as it is still a relatively new area and I have always been intrigued by technology and it would be nice to enter a career revolving around technology and the defense of it
Write ups/discussion board posts
The “Short Arm” of Predictive Knowledge:
As Jonas highlights in Technology and Responsibility, “the short arm” of predictive knowledge means we are never fully able to see or understand the long-term effects of the technologies we create. Because of this, when it comes to developing cyber policy, we have to approach it with caution and responsibility. Since we can’t predict every possible outcome, policies should be created with the future in mind, including the potential risks and harms that might not be visible yet. I agree with Jonas’s point that ethical thinking has to move beyond just the present moment, especially as technology becomes more powerful and more connected in every part of society. I also believe it’s important that these policies are flexible enough to adapt to new threats or unexpected problems as they appear. Our limited knowledge forces us to be even more careful and intentional when shaping the future of cybersecurity, because the consequences of getting it wrong could be much bigger than we expect.
Opportunities for Workplace Deviance:
With increased access to digital tools and systems, employees can engage in misconduct more discreetly and efficiently. For example, misuse of company internet for personal gain, unauthorized access to sensitive data, wasting time during online during work hours, and even cyberbullying have become more common. The anonymity and ease of digital communication can also lower the perceived risk of getting caught, making deviant behaviors more tempting. Additionally, remote work and flexible digital environments can reduce direct supervision, increasing the likelihood of policy violations. While cyber technology enhances productivity, it also demands stronger monitoring and ethical standards to curb misuse.
From Verbeek’s writing (Mod 6, Reading 4) Designing the Public Sphere: Information Technologies and the Politics of Mediation:
As technology becomes smarter and more interconnected, it begins to shape our actions and decisions more than traditional government regulation. The old ways of regulation don’t always apply anymore. Businesses must design technologies that consider ethical implications and potential harm. Individuals need to be more aware of how technology affects their lives. New forms of regulation are needed to ensure that technology serves the public good, prevents harm, and encourages responsible innovation.