Article Review #2: Exploring Legislative and Administrative Cybercrime Laws in Iraq
Introduction:
The article under review dives into Iraq’s legislative and administrative framework managing
cybercrime, highlighting its shortcomings and recommending ways to improve. This article
review will look at how the study pertains to social scientific principles, including its research
objectives, techniques, data analysis, implications for marginalized groups, and overall
contributions to society.
Relating to Social Sciences Principles:
The study corresponds to social science concepts by evaluating legal and administrative
structures through an interpretive lens. As noted by Suleiman (2023), “The lack of effective
resources and manpower prevent the law enforcement agencies in Iraq from taking important
measures to prevent cybercrimes.” It dives into the norms, beliefs, and experiences surrounding
cybercrime governance, utilizing a qualitative technique prevalent in social scientific research.
Research Questions or Hypotheses:
The study looks at the effectiveness of cybercrime legislation and administrative measures in
Iraq. It investigates the following research questions. What are the challenges involved in
combating cybercrime? What are the limitations of the current laws and regulations? How can
governance be enhanced to effectively combat cyber threats? They use these questions to work
through their study and gain the answers they are looking for.
Research Methods:
To obtain insights, the study uses qualitative research techniques, including semi-structured
interviews with legal professionals. The purposive sampling strategy is used to secure genuine
responses from knowledgeable individuals. These legal experts from Iraq provide valuable
perspectives on the legislative and administrative frameworks surrounding cybercrime in the
country.
Types of Data and Analysis:
Data from interviews is examined thematically using NVivo software. Themes addressed include
cybercrime difficulties, legislative limits, administrative actions, and the need for reform. “Inadequate penalties are present in the Penal code for cybercriminals, which negatively impact
the overall legislative framework of the country, leading to insignificant outcomes” (Suleiman,
2023). This underscores the shortcomings in the legal framework governing cybercrimes in Iraq.
Connection to PowerPoint Presentations:
The findings are consistent with principles addressed in PowerPoint presentations on threats,
law, and culture and cybersecurity. In the article it emphasizes the necessity of efficient
governance structures and legal frameworks in dealing with cyber risks, while also adhering to
good governance and the rule of law.
Implications for Marginalized Groups:
While not specifically stated, marginalized populations may be affected by cybercrimes due to
poor access to services and awareness. Strengthening cybercrime legislation and governance may
indirectly assist these groups by improving general cybersecurity and protecting vulnerable
people.
Overall Contributions to Society:
The study benefits society by exposing weaknesses in cybercrime governance and suggesting
suggestions for improvement. It aims to protect individuals, businesses, and national interests
from cyber dangers by strengthening legal and administrative safeguards, resulting in a safer
digital environment for everybody.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the study sheds light on the legislative and administrative components of
cybercrime governance in Iraq. Through qualitative analysis, it identifies critical difficulties and
makes recommendations for improving cybersecurity, making significant contributions to
societal well-being and security.
References
Suleiman, A. (2023). Cybercrime Laws in Iraq: Addressing Limitations for Effective
Governance. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 17(2), 39-44. Retrieved from
https://cybercrimejournal.com/menuscript/index.php/cybercrimejournal/article/view/186/68