{"id":95,"date":"2024-04-28T13:20:26","date_gmt":"2024-04-28T13:20:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/agbenou04\/?p=95"},"modified":"2024-04-28T13:20:26","modified_gmt":"2024-04-28T13:20:26","slug":"article-review-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/agbenou04\/2024\/04\/28\/article-review-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Article Review #2"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Article Review #2<br>Akossiwa Agbenou<br>CYSE 201S<br>February 11, 2024<br>Title: A Grounded Analysis of Experts\u2019 Decision-Making During Security Assessments.<br>Describe how the topic relates to the principles of the social sciences?<br>This article investigates the potential correlation between decision-making by<br>cybersecurity employees and the subsequent vulnerabilities that may arise. The study is highly<br>influenced by the concepts of the social sciences. One of the most apparent aspects pertains to its<br>connection with relativism (Hibshi et al., 2016). This study is connected to the concept of<br>relativism since it investigates the potential relationships between various phenomena and<br>presents empirical evidence to support these relationships. Objectivity is a crucial aspect of<br>research, as it entails the researchers&#8217; systematic collection and analysis of information without<br>any inherent prejudice (Hibshi et al., 2016). The concept of parsimony is also relevant in this<br>context since it entails elucidating the principles and methodologies in a comprehensible manner,<br>while also offering precise definitions and explanations. Moreover, the article is empirical as it<br>just focuses on observable data that individuals have personally encountered (Hibshi et al.,<br>2016). Furthermore, it maintains ethical neutrality by avoiding any potential ethical concerns and<br>being objective.<br>Study&#8217;s research questions or hypotheses<br>The article provides the concept of determinism by illustrating the impact of employee<br>behaviors on cybersecurity. The application of scientific principles facilitates the examination of<br>the research question into the potential impact of behavior on outcomes. The hypothesis posits a<br>correlation between employees&#8217; decision-making and behavior and the occurrence of missing<br>vulnerabilities (Hibshi et al., 2016).<br>Types of research methods used<br>To conduct the research, the researchers administered a survey to cybersecurity<br>specialists, whereby they inquired about the methodologies and rationales underlying their<br>actions.<br>Types of data and analysis done<br>Subsequently, the responses were subjected to analysis employing coding theory, wherein<br>certain keywords were identified alongside stimuli. The results were generated by drawing<br>inferences from the analysis. The analysis and subsequent findings demonstrated that<br>how personnel made decisions and executed their tasks had a direct influence on the level of<br>success of their security measures (Hibshi et al., 2016).<br>Concepts from the PowerPoint presentations relate to the article<br>This article incorporates various theoretical frameworks, including human<br>factors, psychology, victimization, and determinism. Given that the subject entails investigating<br>the underlying motivations behind individuals&#8217; actions, it encompasses the field of psychology,<br>specifically examining its impact on cybersecurity (Hibshi et al., 2016). The study highlights the<br>significance of human aspects in cybersecurity, as it underscores that human actions and their<br>manner can impact cybersecurity and lead to breaches. The article examines how employees<br>can become cyber victims, highlighting the involvement of victimization for a similar purpose<br>(Hibshi et al., 2016). Determinism is particularly relevant in cases when there is a connection<br>between past actions and events that influence a future result (Hibshi et al., 2016). For<br>instance, an employee who acquires the skill of conducting assessments might have an impact on<br>the result.<br>How the topic relates to the challenges, concerns and contributions of marginalized groups<br>The article focuses on the specific obstacles that marginalized communities encounter in<br>the field of cybersecurity. The cyber behavior of marginalized people might be influenced by<br>their limited access to resources and knowledge (Hibshi et al., 2016). The article examines the<br>association between behavior and vulnerability, hence eliciting apprehension among<br>marginalized communities (Hibshi et al., 2016). Another issue that arises is the cultural<br>marginalization of marginalized communities, resulting in their limited access to up-to-date and<br>effective methodologies.<br>The overall contributions of the studies to society<br>In conclusion, this article makes a valuable contribution to society by elucidating the<br>efficacy of various behavioral patterns, hence fostering advancements in the field of<br>cybersecurity. Additionally, it elucidates the most effective approaches for conducting<br>vulnerability checks, thereby contributing to the enhancement of cybersecurity in society.<br>Reference<br>Hibshi, H., Breaux, T. D., Riaz, M., &amp; Williams, L. (2016). A grounded analysis of experts\u2019<br>decision-making during security assessments. Journal of Cybersecurity, 2(2): 147-163.<br>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/cybsec\/tyw010<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Article Review #2Akossiwa AgbenouCYSE 201SFebruary 11, 2024Title: A Grounded Analysis of Experts\u2019 Decision-Making During Security Assessments.Describe how the topic relates to the principles of the social sciences?This article investigates the potential correlation between decision-making bycybersecurity employees and the subsequent vulnerabilities&#8230; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/agbenou04\/2024\/04\/28\/article-review-2\/\">Continue Reading &rarr;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25812,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","wds_primary_category":0},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/agbenou04\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/agbenou04\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/agbenou04\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/agbenou04\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/25812"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/agbenou04\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=95"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/agbenou04\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":96,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/agbenou04\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95\/revisions\/96"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/agbenou04\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=95"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/agbenou04\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=95"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/agbenou04\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=95"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}