For Money (Rank 1)
Financial gain stands as the basic and most popular reason that drives individuals to engage in cybercrimes. The direct extraction of funds through theft and fraud together with extortion drives these cybercriminals to their profitable ends.
Revenge (Rank 2)
The intense emotional drive to seek revenge establishes itself as a frequent cause which motivates criminal activities especially within cybercrime domains including hacking methods and practices of doxxing and distribution of non-consensual explicit content. Such feelings are natural since almost everyone has endured some form of injury in their lifetime.
Political (Rank 3)
The practice of hacktivism for political aims continues to rise as people select it as their preferred form of protest. Participating in cybercrimes through hacking allows those with political beliefs to create disruptions against systems and make their points visible. The situation fits logically into attempts by people to drive societal transformations.
Recognition (Rank 4)
In technical groups and among younger members motivation based on seeking validation plays a major force. Understanding this motivation makes sense but it falls behind concrete motivations which include money and revenge.
Entertainment (Rank 5)
The practice of cybercrime for thrilling fun seems possible although it happens less frequently than when people engage in such behavior out of necessity or anger. Cyberspace crimes conducted by such people typically involve skills testing and achieving feelings of power from creating confusion although this motivation feels less significant than other factors.
Boredom (Rank 6)
The condition of being bored leads some individuals to act on impulse by doing damage through their online activities. Additionally it becomes challenging to support boredom as a fundamental reason for online crimes unless someone examines more forceful emotions like revenge or financial necessity. Boredom appears unintentional and purposeful in nature.
Multiple Reasons (Rank 7)
Multiple factors may impact a person’s motives but “multiple reasons” stands as the least defined category in this context. Multiple reasons for criminal intent create an indistinct target analysis which complicates the identification of single motivating factors and fails to establish clear logical reasons for cybercrime participation.
