The development of cyber-policy and infrastructure is the rules and guidelines to protect how business is conducted on the internet. The cyber-policy and infrastructure protects but also, needs to be protected in itself.  I say this because when rules are established those rules and guidelines operate seamlessly for a good amount of time.  This is true if the rules are implanted successfully and do not fail in the beginning.  Assuming that the rules have not failed, and the infrastructure is solid, you will have to do touch ups.  For example, let’s use the Chrysler Building it was a marvel in its hay day.  As decades went by and the infrastructure of building buildings advanced.  The Chrysler Building advanced as the foundation may be old, but the new advancements are helping everyone to still stay operational, view it, and tour it. The cyber-policy and infrastructure are the same, it must evolve with the growing threat given the short arm predictive knowledge which states in my opinion though advancements are great gifts.  Gifts should be treated as if the gift can be taken away, and in some instances a gift can be a curse. As I stated in the beginning, it is beneficial in many ways to have a cyber-policy and infrastructure for protection, and security.  Protection and security are very valuable in every form no matter what is done to protect it.  Threats to steal and penetrate it will persist.  That is why I referenced the short arm of predictive knowledge as a gift/curse.  At what cost will it keep depleting many resources to protect security and infrastructures.  We have to be mindful how many computer processors will we manufacture, how many technology devices are recycled and re-used?  Are we willing to risk filling up our landfills to have gifts/curses?