Initial Submission: TASK 2. Evalution questions draft

1. How effective is your trauma-focused behavioral therapy?2. Who’s responsible in taking care of the clients in psychiatric services?3 How do you handle situations where clients have extreme behavioral issues?

Corrected Final:

1.How effective are the psychiatric services being offered to current clients?

2. How effectively does the program address clients with extreme behavior issues?

3. Who’s responsible in taking care of the clients in psychiatric services?

Statement: Based on the professor feedback which changing and rephrasing around 2 of my original questions to make it more professional and appropriate. I also had to work on responding to two of my peers.

Task 2: Evaluation Question-25 pts.

2 Questions (Peer Review Task)

Role: Evaluator

Audience: Stakeholders

Format: Research Question

Task: Develop 2 Specific Questions that will be addressed by your evaluation.

Writing Prompts (Key Concepts)

Think about what interests you about the agency and what you would like to know more about. This will help to guide your thinking on developing an evaluation research question. Your question should be broad enough to be answered through evaluation. It should not be narrow or simply answered with a yes or no.

Frame your evaluation questions. Post in blackboard under discussion for Task 2 Draft for your teammates to review and offer feedback. Mark your first post “draft”.
Respond to at least two peers on how they could improve their evaluation research question.
Once you have received feedback from a minimum of two peers, revise and submit your final evaluation research question under submissions tab marked task 2 final. The final question will receive feedback from the instructor and graded.

Task 2 Rubric

CATEGORY	Exceeds Standard	Approaches Standard	Needs Attention
Draft Research Question 5 pts.	Student posted 2 or more clearly developed research questions.	Student posted less than 2 research questions.	Student failed to post and fully develop a draft research question/
Peer Evaluation-5pts	Student peer had peer review done on evaluation questions from two or peers, and reviewed a minimum of two peer evaluations questions.	Student had less than two peer evaluations done and/or conducted less than two peer evaluations.	Student did not have a peer review done or did not conduct a review of peers posting.
Plan Changes-5pts	Student incorporated peer review suggestions and made changes to the questions based on response.	Student vaguely incorporated peer review feedback in making changes to evaluation plan.	Student did not make changes to research questions.
Final Research and Reflection Paragraph 10pts	Students posted a well-developed and concise research questions that was clearly presented.	Student needs minimal changes to the research questions in order to improve clarity.	Student failed to post a final research question and/or the questions was vaguely presented and needs clarity.
Total 25pts.