Mutua discusses the human rights project critically as a three-dimensional metaphor with different complexities. His argument is that the narrative behind human rights depicts some sort of challenge; putting savages against the victims and saviors on the other hand. The construction Savages, victims, and saviors (SVS) is a construction on some of the hypocrisies in the human rights project. He asks human rights’ advocators and thinkers to reflect more on themselves. His piece questions how universal the human rights’ project is, and how neutral it is from a cultural standpoint. Mutua argues for the human rights project to be more universal in the cause. He also argues for a more comprehensive, and deeply political human rights cause. I am in agreeance with Mutua’s thoughts. Although we want citizens of all nations to have equal rights around the world, we do not fight for them hard enough. We are most active in the movement when something major happens and it is plastered across media forms like the news, social media, newspaper, word of mouth. After the outrage about whatever recent event has happened it is all squared away or forgotten because of something else on these media forms, we are silent about it. Human rights are not talked about for a little while until something else major happens. Mutua argues for a deeply rooted political stance when it comes to the human rights movement. In order for a political stance to pull through and be successful, people have to more politically active locally, statewide, nationwide, and even discuss the politics of human rights internationally. I believe the overall point Mutua is trying to make is that we are not fully committed in the human rights project or movement as we should be. It is also very biased, we want fair human rights for certain groups of people when we should be fighting for universal human rights for all groups of people. Sometimes, we only fight for human rights when it hits home for us; for example, the Black Lives Matter movement and the LGBTQ movement. Most people will fight or take a stance for the Black Lives Matter movement when something major happens, but when Trump decided to ban transgenders from the military, I did not see many people taking a stance to fight for and protect Gay rights. There was not much of a conversation about it on the media forms I use daily. My question is why is it that, people will fight for the rights of certain groups people, but let other groups of people suffer?