The rise of biocybersecurity introduces a range of ethical concerns, particularly regarding privacy, consent, and potential misuse of genetic data. One major issue is the security of DNA information, as seen in the University of Washington study where researchers embedded malicious code into a DNA strand. If genetic data can be weaponized, it raises concerns about how securely this information is stored and who has access to it. Unlike passwords, DNA cannot be changed, making breaches especially harmful. Another ethical concern is informed consent. Many people submit DNA samples for ancestry or medical testing without fully understanding how their data might be used, shared, or sold. If cybersecurity vulnerabilities exist in DNA analysis software, should companies be required to disclose these risks before collecting genetic material? There is also the possibility of discrimination based on genetic information. If hackers access DNA data, could it be used by employers, insurance companies, or governments in ways that disadvantage individuals based on their genetic predispositions? This raises questions about fairness and how laws should evolve to protect genetic privacy. I believe stronger regulations are needed to address these ethical concerns. Companies handling genetic data must be transparent about security risks, and there should be strict policies on how this information is stored and shared. Additionally, as the intersection of biology and cybersecurity grows, researchers and developers must consider the ethical implications of their innovations before these risks become a real threat.