I think a major ethical issue to consider in BioCybersecurity is going to be what we will eventually find out can be done with a complete genetic sequence. While there isn’t a huge amount we can currently think of, eventually, we will have technology that may allow us to replicate parts of a person’s DNA that allows us to plant evidence in a crime situation. This is just a tiny portion of the issues that arise with having access to a person’s entire genetic sequence and the ability to change it. You have to consider the unethicality of gene editing, with its evident roots in eugenics. Considering the costs of gene editing, this immediately gives an unfair advantage to the incredibly wealthy in society, allowing them to create some sort of super baby that will then create a more significant divide in classes going forward that will only widen as that continues. Possibly the most significant ethical dilemma is this concept of playing god. Who are we to say that we can change how a human would live their life? It’s one thing to love your future child, want the best for them, and maybe remove their possibility of having asthma, but that’s still a part of who that child would be; you’re just choosing to alter the whole future of the kid. Furthermore, what if a dangerous group gets its hands on this technology? They can choose to breed a form of a super soldier with advanced physical traits and intellect. While it sounds crazy, there is enough proof that plenty of world leaders are crazy enough to do this, creating a danger to the rest of the world. There are too many ways that Gene Editing can lead to major unethical problems in the future, and we need improved biocybersecurity to prevent this.