As time continues to flow, technology continues to evolve, which led to the evolution of bullying. Before the internet, bullying was more physical. It happened in places like schools and at home, where the bully would usually pick on someone by either physical harassment or name-calling. However, due to the evolution of technology, bullying has also evolved. Nowadays, not only does bullying take place at school and home, but it also happens on the internet through social media, video games, and even cell phones. With that being said, in this article review, I will discuss how this article relates to social sciences, different research questions, what types of data and analysis have taken place, what kind of data and analysis was completed, what groups of individuals experienced discrimination and how this article would benefit the world.

In this world that we live in today, we are constantly being studied in one way or another. Although multiple different studies are taking place today, I want to focus our minds on cyberbullying and how it relates to social science. Social science studies how humans behave in relationships and function in society. That said, cyberbullying is connected to social science because it involves our behavior, our interaction with society, and how we are affected through online communication. This is why social scientists study how people are being harassed online, how it has affected their mental health, their relationship with their family, friends, and loved ones, and how they interact in society. By studying cyberbullying, there have been different tactics to help prevent cyberbullying, create policies, and educate people on cyberbullying. That being said, this is why numerous research questions were asked in this article.

As a matter of fact, multiple different research questions were asked in this article. First, it investigates how cyberbullying is defined through existing literature, emphasizing the inconsistencies and important elements such as intent, harm, repetition, and power imbalance. In addition, it targets to understand the contributing elements behind cyberbullying, such as privacy, access to technology, online behavior, and how they can be proficiently measured. Furthermore, it focuses on the role of personality traits, specifically those related to the Dark Tetrad, in influencing both the likelihood of perpetrating and being targeted by cyberbullying. In addition, it observes how people’s direct and indirect experiences and how onlooker actions support how usual and severe cyberbullying develops (Geraldine Ray, G., McDermott, C., & Nicho, M, 2024). Lastly, the article studies the psychological and emotional effects of cyberbullying and considers what remediation techniques could relieve these harmful effects. Having these multiple research questions allows an inclusive breakdown of the current state of cyberbullying research and helps narrow down critical parts for potential examinations.

It is important to realize that with this potential examination, this article has examined data from 71 studies published between 2007 and 2022. That contained experimental research, critical analysis, case studies, academic articles, and systematic reviews covering psychology, social sciences, and computer science (Geraldine Ray, G., McDermott, C., & Nicho, M, 2024). The data assessed covered a wide range of applicant demographics, including children, minors, teens, and adults from various parts of the world. This was done using the PRISMA framework, in which the writers used qualitative and quantitative analytical methods by using descriptive statistics; the writers could show patterns in their publication trends, sample sizes, and study types. In addition, the chi-square test showed a significant correlation between age groups and the research methods used (Geraldine Ray, G., McDermott, C., & Nicho, M, 2024).
Although the article was well written, it only discussed certain groups such as women, LGBTQ, and adolescents. It was reported that women reported higher rates of social anxiety and sleep disturbances.

Given this point, this article significantly persuaded society by contributing to a clear and more organized understanding of cyberbullying in the digital age. They were able to do this by combining the results from 71 different fields of study. This document helps to describe the range and complexity of cyberbullying by emphasizing the mental, emotional, and social harm it can have, mainly amongst the young and vulnerable people in this world. Ultimately, the study helps to promote a more educated and collectively accountable approach to addressing cyberbullying as a serious public health and social justice matter.

Chosen Article

https://academic.oup.com/cybersecurity/article/10/1/tyae026/7928395

Work Cite
Geraldine Ray, G., McDermott, C., & Nicho, M. (2024, December 19). Cyberbullying on social media: Definitions, prevalence, and impact challenges | journal of cybersecurity | oxford academic. academic oup. https://academic.oup.com/cybersecurity/article/10/1/tyae026/7928395