Michael A. Blanchard

CYSE201S

Professor Diwakar

04/10/2024

       The Deformation of The Internet and The Social Aspects

  In this article, it shows to be a educational and academic writing talks a lot about cyber defamation regulations in Indonesia, South Korea, and Malaysia. As in the article, analyzes a lot of permitted frameworks and proximate examinations and breakdowns of these nations as they have a lot of knowledge on them and want to continue to keep having all of this updated knowledge as the laws progress now about the smearing throughout all of the social media, mainly concentrating on cyber vilification.

  The report inspects and talks about the overall suitability and what is happening as of now in most recent research of illegal and unlawful regulations and limitations in these countries such as Indonesia, South Korea, and Malaysia as all of this is following the topic of the situation which is cyber smearing which is also known as slander. It involves and talks about the precise exact and recent articles and data within these lawful frameworks.

 From the article it is obvious that the text summarizes and shows the elements forming cyber defamation in all of these countries that were shown such as Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, etc. It plays a role in every single one of these countries’ permitted systems.  including factual and not to forget accurate details and components (like the facade of aggression and harm to the reputation of others and things in the way. An analysis that can be relative is often carried out and handled to underline the shown parallels and dissimilarities between the two and the legal approaches, methods, and techniques as all of this is completely different from one another. These nations regarding cyber defamation which Indonesia, South Korea, and Malaysia and etc  It talks about how the overall purpose of defamation, security and so much more.

  In the article it talks about how the special defenses and protection of safeguarding is obtainable in each country’s for example Indonesia, and South Korea’s legal system for defamation breaches and violations. It also looks into how these defenses are applied and just overall I would assume ways to overcome these situations such as breaks. There’s are a few of comparisons between the two sentences charged for cyber defamation in each country,  for example including being thrown in prison and or jail and I believe money fines as well that tone would have to face if they had got caught up in one of these situations. The text talks about how these certain laws are used in practice, and will include many challenges and room for progress and excelling.  as it will also examine the role of special defenses and how they will change in the future.

     In conclusion, this article ends by outlining and recapping the findings of the comparative analysis and suggesting potential areas for improvement in the legal systems for all of these countries that take part and deal with all of these cyber defamation rules as it also delivers and supplies an in-depth analysis of cyber defamation laws in Indonesia, South Korea, and Malaysia, putting the spotlight on these topics and letting more of the outside world collg=ect and gain more knowledge as they can be educated on these topics of cyber defamation and etc.

     Now the topic of cyber defamation laws in Indonesia, South Korea, and Malaysia relates closely to the principles of the social sciences, particularly in the fields of law, sociology, and political science. These laws come into contact with many social issues for example I would say like freedom of speech, and online manners, as this has a strong impact on all of this tech on the permitted lawful systems and social relations and exchanges.

     The research questions and or hypotheses of the analysis revolve around understanding the legal frameworks of cyber defamation in these countries as this is a serious situation to talk about and more countries need to get on the train of learning about this but not just these countries but people of these countries and the world as they can provide protection. Recognizing parallels and contrasts of the current regulations in handling cyber defamation, and doing research on these risk that are able to happen in different locations for advancement and a new look in the permitted lawful systems. This article uses a lot of close and proximate lawful analysis as its main analysis procedure. As this will apply to comparing the cyber defamation laws of Indonesia, South Korea, and Malaysia, and all of the other countries to studying these applicable lawful texts, to look at and see the main pros and cons and the parallels and non parallels between the two.

  Data collection likely involves gathering information from legal texts, court rulings, academic articles and etc. The overall analysis would applying many common compositions, and trends,  in the world of legal frameworks, as well as coming up with ways and new ideas of how e=major this will be for these specific laws in play.

     Relationship to PowerPoint concepts: Concepts from PowerPoint presentations in the social sciences, such as legal systems, human rights, technology and society, and globalization, likely relate closely to the article’s discussion on cyber defamation laws. The article may draw on these concepts to contextualize its analysis and explore the broader societal implications of cyber defamation legislation.

  Relation to the Challenges and Concerns of Marginalized Groups: The topic of cyber defamation laws intersects with the challenges and concerns of marginalized groups, particularly regarding issues of online harassment, discrimination, and the unequal distribution of power and influence on digital platforms. Marginalized groups may face disproportionate harm from cyber defamation, and the effectiveness of legal protections in addressing these concerns may vary. This study contributes to society by providing valuable insights into the legal frameworks governing cyber defamation in Indonesia, South Korea, and Malaysia. By identifying similarities, differences, and areas for improvement in these laws, the study can inform policymakers, legal practitioners, and advocacy groups working to address online harassment and protect individuals’ reputations in the digital age. Additionally, by shedding light on the intersection of technology, law, and society, the study contributes to broader discussions on digital rights, freedom of expression, and the regulation of online behavior.

Articel: Cyber Defamation Through the Media: Comparative Study of Indonesia, South Korea and Malaysia