The overlap between cybercrime and criminal justice can be explained in many ways. Cybercrime by definition plays hand in hand with criminal justice as a crime no matter the way it is committed will eventually be processed and dealt with through the criminal justice system. When we look at traditional crime and its characteristics we start to see how similar it is to cybercrime in the way things are carried out, motives for why people do things, etc. This can point to one overlap that is human factors which is something discussed in this class that just basically means human error involved in an incident. This is a huge justification for the automation of many practices and jobs that can function just as well if not better with artificial intelligence at the helm. Being able to identify human factors of an incident involving a cybercrime can then directly or indirectly affect the outcome of a case or future cases in the criminal justice system. Another overlapping factor includes encroachment from the criminal justice system on the people which can be a result of cybercrime. With technology evolving every day, this leads to different ways cybercrime can then be committed. In order for the criminal justice system to properly enforce a ruling over this crime, they have to argue in the courts for a new law or make an addition to the previous law. For example in recent years, we can look at a major landmark for the United States in Carpenter v. United States. Although a cybercrime wasn’t committed, the circumstances involving the cyber security of an individual were brought into play and the way the case was handled throughout the criminal justice department led to it becoming a Supreme Court decision. This decision altered what boundaries the fourth amendment has in terms of certain security allocated to individuals which affects cybercriminals and what rights are entitled to them in the circumstance of a crime being committed.