In this discussion board, we are asked to read the section and identify possible and ethical considerations to explain our position. This is where I stand with this article when it comes to accessing civilians, and their biological genetics. I think it\u2019s 100% up to the person on whether they want their body to neutralize such things. For example under the section Long term effects it states\u201d The commission also spelled out the need to study the people born with edited genomes and their children, to understand the mental and physical health effects of the procedure for generations to come\u201d I agree with this part of the article, because yes, editing, genetic codes in embryos can lead to significant and damaging signs later on in life. I believe that nobody\u2019s embryo should be fiddled or edited scientifically for the pleasure of society, even if it comes with making our nation safe. This is completely unrelated, and I stand with what I say: I disagree with editing embryos’ genetic coding.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In this discussion board, we are asked to read the section and identify possible and ethical considerations to explain our position. This is where I stand with this article when it comes to accessing civilians, and their biological genetics. I think it\u2019s 100% up to the person on whether they want their body to neutralize… <\/p>\n