Emmanuel Tanoh
Article review #2
Professor Yalpi
22 March 24
De-radicalization of Terrorism in Indonesia: Analysing the Implications of Criminal Law Policy
Introduction
The bombing on MH. Thamrin Street in Central Jakarta, which occurred in 2016, is one example of how terrorism has returned to Indonesia and highlights the ongoing threat that violent extremism poses. Unlike traditional crime, terrorism poses special challenges due to its organized violent behavior intended to achieve political goals (Kaur, 2019). Effectively combating terrorism remains elusive despite concerted efforts by the Indonesian government, including deradicalization strategies and international cooperation. This endeavor is made more complex by the need to strike a careful balance between civil liberties and security measures. It is crucial to comprehend the complex interplay between socioeconomic inequality and cultural dynamics as well as other factors that lead to radicalization. Furthermore, issues like recidivism and unintended consequences make current deradicalization initiatives less effective (Kranendonk, Vermeulen, & Van Heelsum, 2018). As such, combating terrorism in Indonesia requires an all-encompassing strategy that incorporates security measures, deradicalization
Relation to Social Science
Through a variety of social science lenses, the article offers a thorough analysis of terrorism in Indonesia, looking at its causes, effects, and deradicalization initiatives. Along with discussing specific incidents like the 2016 MH. Thamrin Street bombing, it delves into theories about how socioeconomic factors and political motivations might contribute to acts of terrorism. It takes into account historical, cultural, and ethical aspects and emphasizes striking a balance between security measures and civil liberties, drawing on fields such as law, criminology, and political science. Although mainly qualitative, the paper emphasizes the value of critical analysis within criminal law policy by incorporating quantitative data to support its claims. All things considered, it provides insightful information about the intricate problem of terrorism and the part social science plays in solving it.
Hypothoses
The series of hypotheses focused on the factors influencing the success of deradicalization efforts, such as the robustness of legal measures and collaboration between stakeholders. Through qualitative analysis of primary and secondary data using content analysis methodology, the study seeks to deepen understanding of how legal frameworks shape deradicalization strategies and interventions in Indonesia.
Research Methods being used
The study examines how Indonesia’s Criminal Law Policy addresses the deradicalization of terrorism through qualitative research. It explores how deradicalization initiatives are shaped by laws, regulations, and sociopolitical variables. Researchers analyze legal texts and contextual factors through document and content analysis, producing valuable insights. New insights and theories based on themes and patterns in the data are possible with the inductive approach.
Data/Analysis
Primary sources like court records and secondary sources like journal articles and books from databases like West Law, JSTOR, Lexis, and Wiley Online are the sources of data used in this research. In order to gain insight into Indonesia’s deradicalization process within the legal framework, researchers use content analysis to methodically interpret qualitative data in order to spot patterns and themes. The data is then coded and categorized. By employing an inductive research methodology, they extract conceptual insights from observed patterns, thereby enabling a more comprehensive investigation of deradicalization initiatives in Indonesia.
Concept
By finding similarities from the powerpoint its concept is applicable to the article because it highlights the significance of sociological theoriesunder the understanding of cyber security as a whole. By identifying the critical role of utilizing cybersecurity strategies they’re formed by international cooperation, social systems, and the influence of social forces such as politics, economy, and the assistance of media. the relationship supports the need for a sociological lens in addressing global threats.
Challenges, Concerns, and Contributions
The difficulties marginalized groups face are closely related to the deradicalization process since these groups frequently deal with structural injustices and social inequalities that can exacerbate feelings of alienation and disenfranchisement. Communities that are marginalized and face discrimination, poverty, and limited opportunities may be especially susceptible to radicalization. Additionally, these groups frequently experience heightened suspicion and surveillance, which can worsen feelings of mistrust and isolation (Dasari, 2023). It is essential to address the underlying socio-economic and political factors that contribute to marginalization in addition to extremist ideologies in order to effectively combat radicalization. By involving marginalized communities in the development and execution of deradicalization initiatives, trust can be built, people can be given more power, and societies can become more inclusive and resilient.
Contributions of the Studies to Society
The studies discussed make significant contributions to society by deepening our understanding of terrorism, extremism, and deradicalization efforts within diverse cultural and legal contexts. By examining various nations’ approaches and policies, these studies provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and ethical implications of legislative measures, guiding policymakers in crafting more targeted and comprehensive strategies (Maniscalco, 2019). Furthermore, they shed light on the complex factors underlying radicalization, informing efforts to address root causes such as societal grievances and extremist ideologies. Ultimately, these studies contribute to enhancing public safety, safeguarding individual rights, and fostering social cohesion by advocating for evidence-based approaches to counterterrorism and deradicalization (Morag, 2023).
Conclusion
In conclusion, terrorism poses serious threats to Indonesia’s national security, making effective de-radicalization initiatives necessary to lessen dangers and advance stability. Even though laws and regulations have flaws, cooperation between the BNPT and interested parties is essential. Proactive deterrence and rehabilitation require increased collaboration between communities, correctional facilities, and law enforcement. In order to address Indonesia’s complex security challenges, de-radicalization efforts must place a high priority on reducing the presence of terrorists, fostering resilience, and building an inclusive society.
Reference page
Dasari, S. (2023). Money Laundering:The Juxtaposition of Laws for Comparative Analysis’ Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development
Kaur, A. (2019). Terrorism and Impact of Technology. IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature
Kranendonk, M., Vermeulen, F., & Van Heelsum, A. (2018). “Unpacking” the identity‐to‐politics link: The effects of social identification on voting among
Muslim immigrants in Western Europe. Political Psychology
Maniscalco, M. L. (2019). Chapter Six the United Kingdom and the Preventing Radicalisation and Terrorism Policy Maria Luisa Maniscalco. In Preventing Radicalisation and Terrorism in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Policies
(pp. 112). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Morag, N. (2023). Counterterrorism Law and Policy in the United Kingdom, Canada,
and Australia: A Comparative Perspective.
Journal of Strategic Security.
Link of article:
https://cybercrimejournal.com/menuscript/index.php/cybercrimejournal/article/view/187/69