It is always a slight curveball when trying to approach new developments of cyber policy and infrastructure. The “short arm” of predictive knowledge is to throw the viewpoint that there is not a completely thought out idea that the final decision will or will not bear consequences. When approaching cyber policy it is vital to understand every piece that goes into it just to make sure that if something in the future happens it falls into cyber policy. It is almost impossible to predict the future for just about everyone except for those who study and understand the weather. If educated and open-minded people were able to gather and have a formulated idea on how to approach cyber policy it would make any mistakes have less of a chance of happening. We can’t look into how people tried to understand technology a 100 years ago because it didn’t exist. There needs to be a review on how cyber policy was approached within the last twenty years even though technology was not up to the level it is now. When you think about first how it was done in the past then it is easy to look for any possible mistakes made and how it should go about fixing. Then you look at the present and try to keep in mind any possible wrong doings that make sense and take those policies that don’t make sense and try to keep it all in mind. Then it will make it a little or even hopefully a lot easier to decide how to progress moving forward with cyber policy and infrastructure. There will definitely be mistakes so trying to be perfect especially when there has not been enough time for advanced technology to fully flourish would be almost impossible. Just take the data that already has been recorded, situate it into modern events and then use that to try and predict what might happen.