5.4. Case Analysis on Whistleblowing
I was four years old when United States started a war against my country of birth Iraq. I’m originally from Baghdad, Iraq and I still remember that day where Apache helicopter flies above my house and shouting at near by neighborhood. That neighborhood used to be full of militias and those militias used to target Iraqi army and US army and due to cooperation between Iraqi army and US army many Iraqi soldiers died. Those casualties that I have seen by Julian Assange showed us some incidents that happened when US invade Iraq, yet no one has talked about Amiriyah shelter bombing, that shelter had many civilians who took Amiriyah shelter as safe place from US bombs in 1991. During 2003 – 2007 in Iraq there were huge mess and I kind of understand how US army might killed some civilians and I’m not exusing US army action toward unclear targets. There were many unfairness during 2003 – 2009 and Iraq used to be one of the dangerous countries and I have lost four of my family during this war. I had my cousin who used to work in police and three of cousins who used to work with Iraqi army and they have lost their life and left orphans kids. In addition, my father had company and this company was very close to hotel where that hotel used for US army conferences. Due to high security protocols that US army took back in 2005 there was car full of bombs that exploded underneath my father’s company, and fortunately my father survived.
Whistleblowing is the term that signifies employee who unethical behavior, illegal activities, or wrongdoing with an organization, authorities or public. Nonetheless, Julian Assange in my perspective is some what whistleblowing due to his activities with releasing classified and secret documents of governments to public. Julian Assange situation is argumentative some people think that Julian Assange is showing the truth behind world’s largest government such United States, United Kingdom, etc. World is full of injustices and I believe that people is living in sort of bubble and most people do not want to see the truth. Hence, these incidents such as the video of the case analysis might be shock for most people. I like to live in the bubble where I do not want to see the truth and live the ordinary life. Wikileaks has revealed those secrets and behind the curtain talks to the people, and most people finds it interesting especially if you are interested governments and politics.
Vandekerckhove concept focuses on Whistle-blowing the writers probably go into detail about what whistleblowing is which is when workers or insiders alert authorities or the public about immoral, unlawful, or damaging acts occurring within their company. Examples of whistleblowing situations and the reasons behind them may fall under this category. the concept of reasonable loyalty, it is possible to conclude that employees may have competing allegiances to their employer and other stakeholders, such the public or regulatory agencies. Perhaps the writers will talk about how workers resolve these disputes and choose to either come clean or stick with their company. Rational loyalty examining the concept of reasonable loyalty, it is possible to conclude that employees may have competing allegiances to their employer and other stakeholders, such the public or regulatory agencies. Perhaps the writers will talk about how workers resolve these disputes and choose to either come clean or stick with their company. Ethical conundrums when thinking about whistleblowing, employees may encounter ethical conundrums that might be covered in this document. This can entail balancing allegiance to coworkers, the organization, or other stakeholders against the possible harm that the organization’s activities could create. Policies and Organizational Culture Vandekerckhove and Commers may talk about how corporate culture and rules might encourage or inhibit whistleblowing. They might look at how norms and organizational structures affect workers’ choices to report misconduct or keep quiet. The Effects of Disclosure The writers may examine how whistleblowing may affect an employee’s career, legal ramifications, and possibility of reprisal. They might also consider the more general effects on organizations, like harm to their reputation and a decline in trust. Ethical and Legal Structures The legal and ethical frameworks of whistleblowing, including applicable laws and regulations and ethical theories that can guide employees’ judgments in certain circumstances, may be covered in the article. “Whistle Blowing and Rational Loyalty” examines the variables that affect employees’ actions and the consequences for both individuals and organizations, potentially offering insights into the difficulties of whistleblowing within businesses. “Whistle Blowing and Rational Loyalty” probably explores the psychological and emotional facets of whistleblowing in addition to the previously discussed concerns. When faced with circumstances that force them to contemplate raising the alarm, employees frequently endure severe internal conflict. They could struggle with emotions such as dread, guilt, and uncertainty regarding the results of their deeds. The psychological mechanisms at work, such as moral anguish, cognitive dissonance, and the conflict between individual and organizational values, may be examined in the study. The writers may also go over how organizational leadership influences people’s views on whistleblowing. Strong leadership that places a high value on openness, responsibility, and moral conduct can foster a culture in which staff members feel free to report misconduct without worrying about facing consequences. On the other hand, dictatorial or poisonous leadership philosophies can stifle criticism and dissuade people from coming forward, which can foster a climate of silence and cooperation. The significance of internal organization support systems for whistleblowers may also be covered in this essay. Whistleblowers frequently experience harassment, exclusion, and even threats to their personal safety. Strong support systems, including private avenues for reporting, legal aid, and counseling services, can help reduce these risks and motivate more people to voice their concerns. Furthermore, “Whistle Blowing and Rational Loyalty” might discuss how outside parties like the media, law enforcement, and civil society organizations participate in the whistleblowing process. These parties are essential in elevating the voices of those who report misconduct, looking into claims of wrongdoing, and making companies answerable for their deeds. The study may look at case studies where organizations and industries have undergone significant adjustments as a result of outside pressure. The authors may also investigate the long-term effects of whistleblowing on people and organizations. Whistleblowers may suffer serious personal and professional consequences, despite the fact that they are frequently praised as heroes for uncovering misconduct and defending the public good. Strategies for reducing these dangers and assisting whistleblowers with their post-disclosure journey—such as monetary rewards, legal safeguards, and reputation-building initiatives—may be covered in the paper. “Whistle Blowing and Rational Loyalty” provides an extensive examination of the complex phenomena of whistleblowing, emphasizing its aspects related to ethics, psychology, organizations, society, and organizations. The article advances knowledge of how people and companies deal with integrity, accountability, and loyalty concerns in today’s intricate corporate world by illuminating the nuances of whistleblowing.
The article “Care and Loyalty in the Workplace” by Julinna Oxley and D.E. Wittkower in “Applying Care Ethics to Business” probably addresses the application of care ethics principles in the context of corporate contexts, with a special emphasis on the ideas of care and loyalty. Care Ethics in Business yhey may look at how leadership, decision-making, and employee interactions are just a few of the areas in which care ethics, which places a strong emphasis on empathy, accountability, and interpersonal relationships, can be included. Trust and Loyalty The writers may talk on how encouraging a caring culture at work might make workers more devoted to one another. They might look at the reciprocal relationship between loyalty and care, which suggests that taking care of employees can lead to more devotion and commitment from them. The well-being of employees can be given priority by organizations through the integration of care ethics into HR policies, benefits packages, work-life balance programs, and systems of support for both personal and professional growth. Moral Guidance It is possible that Oxley and Wittkower may talk about the part leaders play in creating a friendly and encouraging work atmosphere. They could stress how crucial it is for managers to act with empathy, justice, and morality in order to cultivate employee loyalty and trust. Organizational Culture: The writers may examine how workplace norms, attitudes, and actions are shaped by organizational culture and how caring ethics can have an impact on these aspects. They might talk about how to foster a culture of caring that prioritizes respect, cooperation, and empathy. The article’s overall goal is probably to offer insights on how companies might apply care ethics concepts to build more ethical, sustainable, and encouraging work environments that promote employee well-being and organizational success. A significant paradigm change from conventional corporate ethics frameworks is provided by care ethics in the workplace. Care ethics places an emphasis on the importance of connections, empathy, and accountability within organizational dynamics rather than emphasizing abstract ideas or objectives. This strategy forces companies to take into account the real needs and experiences of people who are involved in business dealings, such as stakeholders, consumers, and employees. The development of a culture that prioritizes compassion, empathy, and teamwork is essential to the implementation of care ethics in business. Businesses may promote trust, loyalty, and long-lasting relationships by putting the interests of all stakeholders first. Beyond merely carrying out their duties, employees who believe that their company truly cares about them are more likely to become dedicated and committed. Furthermore, care ethics emphasizes how crucial moral leadership is to establishing and maintaining a compassionate work atmosphere. Leaders who exhibit values like justice, empathy, and honesty set the standard for moral conduct inside the company. Honest leaders instill confidence and trust in their teams by showing a sincere care for the welfare of their staff members and encouraging a climate of candid communication and teamwork.
Moreover, the application of care ethics encompasses a range of organizational practices, such as stakeholder involvement, corporate social responsibility (CSR), and dispute resolution. Care ethics urges organizations to resolve issues with compassion and empathy, looking for win-win solutions that protect relationships and advance understanding. Concerning corporate social responsibility (CSR), caring ethics pushes companies to think about their larger influence on the environment and society in addition to just adhering to legal and regulatory obligations. Businesses may show that they care about the interests of all stakeholders, not just shareholders, by funding projects that tackle social and environmental issues. Furthermore, the significance of genuine stakeholder interaction and dialogue is underscored by care ethics. Businesses can fortify connections, foster trust, and improve their standing as conscientious corporate citizens by proactively incorporating stakeholders in decision-making procedures and considering their viewpoints, requirements, and interests. In conclusion, integrating values like empathy, compassion, accountability, and justice into all facets of organizational behavior and decision-making is essential to applying care ethics to business. In addition to making workplaces more ethical and sustainable, organizations can also make them more resilient, creative, and profitable over the long term by putting employee well-being first, encouraging ethical leadership, and having meaningful, inclusive interactions with stakeholders.
As you can see, in the context of organizational behavior and decision-making, ethics and whistleblowing are linked, illustrating the intricate relationship between personal moral integrity and corporate accountability. When an individual, frequently at considerable personal risk, reveals unethical or unlawful activities within their firm, this is known as whistleblowing. It is an essential tool for exposing misconduct, encouraging openness, and making institutions responsible for their deeds. Whistleblowing poses significant ethical concerns regarding commitment, morality, and the greater good. Employees may, on the one hand, be so devoted to their company and coworkers that they choose to keep quiet about wrongdoing. Nonetheless, this allegiance needs to be weighed against more general moral standards like truthfulness, equity, and justice. Employees may have a moral duty to speak up against corporate wrongdoing if it endangers stakeholders’ well-being or transgresses basic moral standards, even if doing so goes against their organizational loyalty. Concerns concerning the whistleblower’s possible implications, such as career setbacks, exclusion from social groups, and retribution, are also raised by whistleblowing. Organizations must set up transparent procedures for reporting wrongdoing and shield whistleblowers from reprisals due to ethical concerns. Furthermore, moral leaders ought to promote an environment of transparency, responsibility, and moral behavior where workers are empowered to voice concerns without worrying about retaliation.