Entertainment rate: I would give this article a 5 because it doesn’t relate to the PowerPoint and does not fit the needs of cybersecurity.

Political rate: I would give this article a 6 because it does not relate to any techniques used in the PowerPoint and it only discusses the issue and not how to prevent it.

Revenge: I rate this article a 4 because it relates to the behavioral theory, and it touches base on understanding the issue and how to prevent it.

Boredom: I rate this article a 1 because it addresses the issue and uses the Behavorial theory steps and Psychodynamic theory as well and gives the reader a great explanation of what this expertise did to solve the issue of cyberbullying.

Recognition: I rate this article a 3 because it addresses the issue, and how it affected the individual being used in the article. but it does not give readers the understanding of the issue and how to finalize the problem.

For Money: I rate this article a 7 because it only touches on the expertise’s background and what this expertise did and there was no steps or techniques used to identify the issue.

Multiple reasons: I give this article a 1 because it gives a brief discussion of the problem and relates to the Psychodynamic theory and uses great information on the What Drives Hackers to a Life of Cybercrime?