{"id":371,"date":"2026-05-04T03:04:39","date_gmt":"2026-05-04T03:04:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/hurdlecyber\/?page_id=371"},"modified":"2026-05-04T03:09:22","modified_gmt":"2026-05-04T03:09:22","slug":"free-writings","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/hurdlecyber\/free-writings\/","title":{"rendered":"Free-Writings"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Over the semester, we had to write several free writings using business writing skills, and these were some of my favorites.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ethical Considerations of CRISPR Gene Editing<\/p>\n\n\n\n

-When I think about the rise of biocybersecurity and how ethical it is, I come to the conclusion that it is unethical. In this high digital age, where we use things like Face ID and fingerprint scans on the newest versions of phones and security boxes, one thing that caught my eye in the readings was the digitization of DNA. As stated before, I think this is very dangerous. You are essentially trusting a company to protect your DNA, while data and accounts might have been leaked before. Your DNA represents your entire being, and entrusting that to be uploaded to a digital database sounds very risky.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Following that, a question about whether employers should be allowed to use employee DNA came up. I think this is both incredibly immoral and unsafe. In conclusion, DNA describes a person’s entire humanity, and I do not believe cybersecurity will be able to keep it safe. I think this poses a significant danger to the public, especially if it ever becomes mandatory to secure income or get approved for various things. Hackers adapt every year, and with that, so does cybersecurity, but attacks always happen. If someone can obtain another person’s DNA, it could lead to wide-ranging consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Human Factor in Cybersecurity<\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1YcoUmlfQ9vS4f2nhAVqQQgGRqS39mNh0rFocxDxjZxg\/edit?usp=sharing<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Journal write-up From Verbeek’s writing (Mod 6, Reading 4) Designing the Public Sphere: Information Technologies and the Politics of Mediation<\/p>\n\n\n\n

BLUF<\/p>\n\n\n\n

     In this article, Verbeek explores the dynamics of the public sphere and the integral role of technology in shaping our thoughts and daily lives. He argues that dismissing new technologies is an outdated stance, particularly in light of practices like Amazon\u2019s targeted advertising based on search history. This raises concerns about how we interact with technology and its effects on our perception.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

     Verbeek emphasizes that humans and technology are inextricably linked, with newer forms of technology mediating our experiences. For instance, virtual reality can create sensations such as phantom touch or motion sickness, blurring the line between virtual and real. As technology continues to evolve, there is a pressing need for early regulations to prevent potential dependency on these tools, especially among younger individuals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

     In terms of ethics, Verbeek advocates for a proactive approach to integrating new technologies. He posits that we have a moral duty to shape technology during its design phase to ensure it aligns with social norms and minimizes discomfort. This stance counters the traditional view of resisting innovation, suggesting instead that we guide and innovate alongside emerging technologies. The development of consumer products like smart glasses should be approached with consideration for privacy and social impact.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/p>\n\n\n\n

     Instead of attempting to police and get rid of newer technologies, we should be combating them and regulating them from the inside. This will help address issues related to invasiveness and foster healthier interactions with technology. Verbeek highlights the importance of awareness regarding potential privacy invasions, such as those posed by smart appliances. By embracing Verbeek\u2019s framework, we can enhance cyber hygiene and safety, as well as facilitate the difficult conversations needed for the policies that can be implemented in the future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Verbeek, P. P. (2011). Designing the Public Sphere: Information Technologies and the Politics of Mediation. Pages 217-227.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Over the semester, we had to write several free writings using business writing skills, and these were some of my favorites. Ethical Considerations of CRISPR Gene Editing -When I think about the rise of biocybersecurity and how ethical it is, I come to the conclusion that it is unethical. In this high digital age, where… <\/p>\n

Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":31335,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/hurdlecyber\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/371"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/hurdlecyber\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/hurdlecyber\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/hurdlecyber\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/31335"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/hurdlecyber\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=371"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/hurdlecyber\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/371\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":377,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/hurdlecyber\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/371\/revisions\/377"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/hurdlecyber\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=371"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}