Article review 2

Article Review #3: AI and Cybercrime – Exploring the Connection

Jahmir brown 

Cybersecurity and the Social Sciences (CYSE 201S)

Diwakar Yalpi

November 12 2024

Article Review #3: AI and Cybercrime – Exploring the Connection

 Introduction

The article “AI and Cybercrime: Understanding the Risks and Opportunities” represents the intersection of developments in AI technology with the misuse thereof by cybercriminals. It goes deeply into the ways in which AI-namely, Large Language Models like ChatGPT-can be put to nefarious purposes, such as phishing scam creation or malware generation. This paper examines how AI contributes to cybercrime through the lens of Cyber Routine Activities Theory and its implications for cybersecurity measures.

Relation to Social Science Principles

This article is highly representative of the social sciences, as it tests the interaction between technological advancement and human behavior. Further, the emphasis of this article on the societal impact of AI in changing the dynamics of cybercrime and, consequently, the need to adapt social and technological norms in safeguarding communities underpins it as an article representative of the principles of the social sciences. The core aspect of social science-the analysis of human interaction with technology and just how such interactions may enable or mitigate crime-is a core element here.

Research Questions or Hypotheses

Amongst the several critical questions that the article has identified are: What are some of the most important motivations for cybercriminals to use AI tools? and Where do current measures for cybersecurity fall short with respect to considering AI-driven threats? The hypothesis was that ease of use facilitates cybercrime via AI models, like ChatGPT, by lowering technical thresholds for potential criminals.

Research Methods

This study employs thematic analysis informed by a review of the literature and in-depth interviews with experts in cybersecurity and criminal justice. It synthesizes findings from a multiple-case study and expert opinions by using a qualitative approach for a comprehensive understanding of AI’s dual role in society: it serves as a tool for innovation while it may turn out to be a weapon of exploitation.

Data and Analysis 

It examines the documented use of AI in cybercrimes, including automated phishing and social engineering cases. Data sources include interviews with cybersecurity experts about the nature of misuse of AI and possible responses. It further points out the flexibility of cybercriminals in using new technologies and the delay in policy and technical responses.

Relation to Class Concepts

The topic falls squarely within class discussions of cybersecurity frameworks, the digital divide, and how proactive measures are needed rather than reactive ones to prevent cyber incidents. The use of Cyber-RAT in this article is a great applicability with the theoretical models studied in class that are focused on routine behaviors that influence the risk of victimization. This further solidifies the thought that as technology continues to evolve, so must the understanding and prevention.

Marginalized Groups

These might be the AI cybercrimes that fall disproportionately on the marginalized groups who, without wherewithal to restore losses, could fall prey to identity theft or scams. Misused AI can only heighten such vulnerability, and it is for social policy to remedy the situation by ensuring that fairness is accorded in the protective cybersecurity measure.

Societal Contributions

This research underlines the need for strong AI governance and increased cybersecurity measures. The study contributes to the larger discourse on the dual-use nature of AI with respect to responsible AI development and deployment. This may provide a way through which policymakers and technology developers could develop safeguards that might temper risks while still leveraging AI’s positive potential.

References

Investigating the Intersection of AI and Cybercrime: Risks, Trends, and Countermeasures

Article Review #4: Exploring the Role of Intellectual Security in Cognitive Development

Jahmir brown 

Cybersecurity and the Social Sciences (CYSE 201S)

Diwakar Yalpi

November 12 2024

Article Review #4: Exploring the Role of Intellectual Security in Cognitive Development

Introduction

The article debates the concept of intellectual security understood as a critical factor in developing cognitive stability and resilience, especially in young adults entering mainstream multicultural society. Intellectual security can be described as a kind of psycho emotional guardian that would allow the students to engage critically with a huge number of ideas while preserving personal identity and coherence.

Relation to Social Science Principles

Intellectual security  Had something to do with various social science ideas on identity  resilienceAnd cognitive development. It has been identified that these students were exposed to other belief systems through education and social networking which supported the encouragement of students intellectual development and  Security it also aligns with theories of

cognitive and social resilience  

Research Questions/Hypotheses

The research questions address how gender acts as a particular condition which shapes intellectual security and cognitive resilience among students in an educational setting. Thus, its hypothesis is instituted on the basis that intellectual security helps students to balance diverse viewpoints and bolster critical thinking skills.

Research Methods

A mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative interviews with quantitative surveys to collect data, was used for the study to analyze how gender, educational background, and exposure to social media affect students’ intellectual security. The participants were university students from diverse disciplines and cultural backgrounds.

Data and Analysis

Results showed that gender is a critical determinant in intellectual security since it impacts cognitive resilience differently. Social media was found to contribute to widely opening up access to variant ideas while simultaneously overwhelming students with the rapid flow of information. A gender-based analysis has given indications about unique challenges and strengths which have been associated with developing intellectual stability.

Relation to Class Concepts

This study aligns with class discussions on cognitive resilience and the influences of media upon intellectual growth. Class topics regarding the influence of society upon cognition and identity development will reflect the role of educational systems and multicultural environments in encouraging openness and resilience.

Marginalized Groups

The findings of the study have brought into focus that marginalized groups face extra challenges due to a lack of equal access to intellectual resources and because of cultural diversities. This calls for specific educational policy directions that take care of such disparities.

Societal Contributions

The research thus provided valuable lessons that could be used by educators and policymakers in their efforts to advance intellectual security by crafting better curricula and support systems. The stakeholders of intellectual security will, therefore, be better positioned to enable students to start surfing complex information landscapes more critically, forming informed and resilient persons.

Discussion and Future Directions

   That apart, it also recognizes a number of limitations in the study, including small sample size and influence of socio-economic factors. Further research might build on these findings by using larger and more diverse sample groups and studying the long-term implications of intellectual security on career development.

Conclusion

The article contributes to a better understanding of intellectual security as the basis in higher education, providing indications of gender-based differences and the influence of social media on the development of educational frameworks enabling students to practice critical thinking, resilience, and identity formation.

 reference 

View of Factors Influencing the Formation of Intellectual Security among University Students: A Field Study