{"id":315,"date":"2026-05-06T01:55:48","date_gmt":"2026-05-06T01:55:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jareda-h\/?p=315"},"modified":"2026-05-06T01:55:48","modified_gmt":"2026-05-06T01:55:48","slug":"article-review-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jareda-h\/2026\/05\/06\/article-review-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Article Review #2"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Article Review #2: Cybercrime in Society: Prevention and Policy<br>Student Name: Jared Amonoo-Harrison<br>School of Cybersecurity, Old Dominion University<br>CYSE 201S: Cybersecurity and the Social Sciences<br>Instructor Name: Diwakar Yalpi<br>Date: April 16, 2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Introduction<\/strong><br>This article examines how spending on CyberTech affects bank stability. It finds a point<br>where more spending can hurt rather than having stability. The study concludes that even though<br>CyberTech is needed strategically, spending too much leads to fewer benefits and more risks for<br>banks worldwide.<br><br><strong>Relation\/Connection to Social Science Principles<\/strong><br>The article connects to social science principles by exploring the mix of technology,<br>economics, and human behavior within the banking sector. It talks about how technological<br>advancements influence social structures and institutional responses, especially in the context of<br>financial stability and risk-taking behaviors within banks. The discussion on human interactions<br>with technology and the potential for cheating if controls aren\u2019t present also highlights a social<br>science perspective on operational risk. The study&#8217;s view of financial inclusion and digital<br>disparities affecting cybersecurity behavior among individuals, particularly in developing<br>nations, reflects social levels and its impact on technological adoption and safety.<br><br><strong>Research Question \/ Hypothesis \/ Independent Variable \/ Dependent Variable<\/strong><br>Research Question: The study investigates whether the law of diminishing marginal returns from<br>overspending on CyberTech affects bank stability. It also explores if an extra dollar spent on<br>CyberTech provides a marginal benefit for stability.<br>Hypothesis: The proposed hypothesis (HA) is that a marginal increase in CyberTech spending<br>above what is necessary adversely affects the financial stability of a bank.<br>Independent Variable: The independent variables are CyberTech spending, measured in two<br>ways: the natural log of total CyberTech spending and total CyberTech spending as a percentage<br>of non-interest operating expenses. These variables also include their squared values to test non-<br>linear relationships.<br>Dependent Variable: The dependent variable is bank stability, which is proxied by the Z-score.<br>The Z-score is calculated as ROA + (Equity\/Assets)\/ROA and indicates a lower probability of<br>insolvency with a higher score.<br><br><strong>Types of Research Methods Used<\/strong><br>The study employs a quantitative research approach, analyzing a global sample of banks.<br>The data on CyberTech spending was manually collected from the financial statements of banks<br>from 43 countries for the period 2008\u20132017. The remaining data, such as bank-level and<br>country-level control variables, were gathered from the Bloomberg database.<br><br><strong>Types of Data Analysis Used<\/strong><br>OLS Estimation: Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) models were used, correcting standard errors<br>for country and year clustering.<br>Dynamic System GMM: Dynamic system GMM (Generalized Method of Moments) models<br>were applied, including a lag dependent variable to address potential endogeneity issues and<br>provide more consistent parameter estimates.<br>Fixed Effect Panel Regressions: Fixed effect panel regression models were employed to<br>account for omitted variable bias.<br>Data Visualization: Scatter plots and polynomial regression splines were used to visually<br>illustrate the relationship between CyberTech spending and bank stability.<br>Robustness Checks: The study conducted robustness checks using an alternative Z-score<br>(before taxes) and by splitting samples based on high and low CyberTech spending levels.<br><br><strong>Connections to Other Course Concepts<\/strong><br>The study highlights diminishing returns, showing that overinvestment in CyberTech can<br>reduce bank stability. It also connects to organizational decision-making, technological change,<br>and how FinTech and regulation influence traditional banking models and risk behavior.<br><br><strong>Overall Societal Contributions of the Study\/Conclusion<\/strong><br>The study shows that excessive CyberTech investment can reduce bank stability,<br>reinforcing diminishing returns. It helps policymakers and bank managers make better<br>investment decisions and highlights differences between developed and developing countries.<br>Overall, it improves understanding of cybersecurity\u2019s impact on financial systems and society.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Article Review #2: Cybercrime in Society: Prevention and PolicyStudent Name: Jared Amonoo-HarrisonSchool of Cybersecurity, Old Dominion UniversityCYSE 201S: Cybersecurity and the Social SciencesInstructor Name: Diwakar YalpiDate: April 16, 2026 IntroductionThis article examines how spending on CyberTech affects bank stability. It finds a pointwhere more spending can hurt rather than having stability. The study concludes that&#8230; <\/p>\n<div class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jareda-h\/2026\/05\/06\/article-review-2\/\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":32159,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","wds_primary_category":0},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jareda-h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jareda-h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jareda-h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jareda-h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32159"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jareda-h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=315"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jareda-h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":316,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jareda-h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315\/revisions\/316"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jareda-h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=315"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jareda-h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=315"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jareda-h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=315"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}