PART ONE: Your Initial Post (15 points): 1. Identify one of your biases and describe how it was expressed in your research paper? (3 points) • One bias I observed in my study paper was that I underlined the benefits… Continue Reading →
Part One: Your Post (19 points): DIRECTIONS: Paste the question in bold print, followed by your answer, e.g., What is one new insight that emerged from reading one of the #5 Discussion peer posts? 1. Write your research question as a… Continue Reading →
PART ONE (18 points): EXAMPLE: ADDITIONAL GUIDELINES: In the “assumption” box/paragraph, you might find it helpful to refer to Ch. 2, p. 53 to 57, to briefly describe the assumptions of each discipline. * The ODU Cybersecurity program/major is considered… Continue Reading →
1. PART ONE (2 points): A. What is your current research question? Write it as a question. B. Was this research question officially approved by Dr. LaFever? If it’s not yet been approved, briefly explain why (-2 points if not… Continue Reading →
References: Repko, A. F. & Szostak, R. (2021). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
© 2025 Jasmyn Wilhelm — Powered by WordPress
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑