The interaction between offenders and victims throughout any cyber crime has changed over time as technology and the advancement of crimes has changed. for ONE, it makes it significantly difficult to track down the offenders because due to the advancement in crimes and technology, the offender can be located anywhere throughout the world and the victim may never know who they are. In addition, the offender potentially could pose as someone other than themselves to fool or trick the victim. For example, if a offender is stalking someone in person it would be easier to track and notice who the offender is and catch them, but with cyber stalking the offender could pretend to be a friend of their victim or even an officer of the law to invade the privacy and continue violating this person and carrying out their crime. With technology always growing and advancing, it is becoming more and more difficult to pinpoint where someone is when they attack and if they are who they claim to be online. With GPS spoofing and detailed fake accounts, attackers can keep these attacks from being found out long enough for them to get away or start a new account and cover their tracks. Another big issue within the interaction between the attacker and the victim is that within different states the regulations differ on what needs to be carried out in order for it to be a violation. For example, if it is a “repeat behavior” state then it needs to be clear and evident that the action was carried out multiple times and it wasn’t just one instance or if it is an ” told to stop” theme within the regulation then they victim has to have clear evidence that they have asked for the inappropriate behavior to stop. With the rules differing from state to state and the parameters of the cyberspace is endless, it is very difficult for some victims to ever find out or truly stop their offenders .