{"id":304,"date":"2025-04-29T21:43:48","date_gmt":"2025-04-29T21:43:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jessezinsou\/?page_id=304"},"modified":"2025-04-29T21:43:48","modified_gmt":"2025-04-29T21:43:48","slug":"article-review","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jessezinsou\/article-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Article Review"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Jesse Zinsou<br>2\/19\/2025<br>Article Review #1: Impact of Cybersecurity and AI\u2019s Related<br>Factors on Incident Reporting Suspicious Behavior and<br>Employees Stress: Moderating Role of Cybersecurity Training<br>The article &#8220;Impact of Cybersecurity and AI\u2019s Related Factors on Incident Reporting Suspicious<br>Behavior and Employees Stress: Moderating Role of Cybersecurity Training&#8221; looks at how<br>different aspects of artificial intelligence (AI) and cybersecurity affect employees&#8217; stress levels<br>and willingness to report suspicious activity. This study examines the moderating impact of<br>cybersecurity training on these associations and was published in the International Journal of<br>Cyber Criminology. By considering employee-related variables, the authors want to provide light<br>on how firms might improve their cybersecurity incident management.<br>Connection to Social Sciences Principles<br>By examining human behavior inside organizational structures, this study draws on social<br>science. It focuses on how employees view and respond to cybersecurity threats and AI<br>integration. It explores social topics including organizational culture and training initiatives, as<br>well as psychological ones like stress and perceived threats. Developing successful tactics that<br>balance technology improvements with human elements requires an understanding of these<br>dynamics.<br>Research Questions or Hypotheses<br>The study makes a number of beliefs, such as:<br>The association between employee stress levels and cybersecurity incident management is<br>mediated by incident reporting of suspicious activity.<br>The association between incident reporting of suspicious activity and cybersecurity awareness is<br>moderated by cybersecurity training.<br>Stress levels among employees are influenced by perceived dangers in AI, with incident<br>reporting serving as a mediating effect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the context of cybersecurity, these theories seek to clarify the intricate relationships that exist<br>between employee perceptions, organizational procedures, and stress reactions.<br>Research methods<br>The authors used surveys to gather information from workers in a variety of businesses as part<br>of their quantitative study design. The poll assessed a number of characteristics, including staff<br>stress levels, incident reporting behaviors, AI-related aspects, cybersecurity incident<br>management methods, and the degree of cybersecurity training obtained. The suggested<br>hypotheses were then tested and the correlations between the variables were examined using<br>statistical analysis of the data.<br>Data And Analysis<br>Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used in data analysis to evaluate the direct and<br>indirect interactions between the variables. The findings showed that increased awareness and<br>efficient cybersecurity incident management have a favorable impact on reporting suspicious<br>activity, which lowers employee stress levels. Furthermore, these associations were found to be<br>moderated by cybersecurity training, indicating that well-designed training initiatives might<br>boost staff members&#8217; self-assurance and proactive approaches to managing cybersecurity risks.<br>Contributions to society<br>For policymakers and organizational leaders looking to improve cybersecurity resilience, this<br>research provides insightful information. In order to strengthen cybersecurity defenses, the<br>report promotes investments in human capital by highlighting the vital role that staff training<br>and assistance play. Employee stress can be decreased, incident reporting can be enhanced, and<br>the organization&#8217;s security posture can be strengthened by putting the suggested measures into<br>practice.<br>Conclusion<br>In conclusion, the article offers a thorough examination of the ways in which AI and<br>cybersecurity-related elements affect employee stress and incident reporting practices. The<br>moderating effect of cybersecurity training highlights the need for ongoing training and<br>assistance for staff members. Businesses that give priority to these areas will be in a better<br>position to successfully negotiate the complexity of today&#8217;s cybersecurity issues<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Article Review #2: Impact of Cyber-Victimization&#8217;s on Anger and Frustration: Role of AI, E-<br>Governance, and Cyberbullying Coping<br>By: Jesse Zinsou<br>4\/10\/2025<br>Introduction<br>With a special focus on rage and frustration, the study &#8220;Impact of Cyber-Victimization&#8217;s on<br>Anger and Frustration: Role of AI, E-Governance, and Cyberbullying Coping&#8221; examines the<br>psychological impacts of cyber-victimization. Additionally, it looks at how coping strategies, e-<br>government, and artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to combat cyberbullying. The study is<br>relevant to learning how governance, technology, and mental health interact in the digital age.<br>Relevance to Social Science Principles<br>By exploring human behavior, emotional reactions, and societal systems, this research touches<br>on social science concepts. It examines how people respond to being victimized online as well<br>as the efficacy of governance and technology responses. The study emphasizes how<br>cyberbullying affects people psychologically and how social structures might help lessen these<br>impacts.<br>Research Questions or Hypotheses<br>The following are the study&#8217;s main research questions:<br>What effects does cyber-victimization have on people&#8217;s emotions of rage and frustration?<br>How might e-government and artificial intelligence help address instances of cyberbullying?<br>These questions seek to identify the psychological costs associated with cyberbullying and<br>evaluate how well governance and technology approaches handle these issues.<br>Research Methods used<br>The research uses a combination of methods:<br>Qualitative methods include focus groups and interviews with victims of cyberbullying to learn<br>about their individual experiences and feelings.<br>Quantitative methods include surveys that gauge the degree of rage and frustration felt by<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>those who have been cybervictims.<br>This combination enables a thorough comprehension of the problem&#8217;s statistical and emotional<br>dimensions.<br>Connection to PowerPoint Concepts<br>The study supports ideas covered in class, including:<br>Social engineering is the study of how online fraudsters deceive their victims.<br>Cybersecurity Measures: Assessing how AI can be used to identify and stop cyberbullying.<br>E-Government: Examining how digital platforms and governmental regulations might help<br>combat cyber-victimization.<br>Marginalized Groups&#8217; Challenges, Concerns, and Contributions<br>The difficulties faced by marginalized groups are discussed in the article, especially those who<br>are disproportionately impacted by cyberbullying, such as youth who identify as LGBTQ+ and<br>members of minority communities. It draws attention to the ways that cyber-victimization<br>intensifies emotions of rage and frustration, resulting in social exclusion and mental health<br>problems. The study also explores how e-government and artificial intelligence may be<br>customized to effectively assist various populations.<br>Contributions To Society<br>The study benefits society in the following ways:<br>Improving Knowledge: Offering perspectives on the psychological effects of cyberbullying.<br>Providing information that can direct the creation of beneficial policies and actions is known as<br>&#8220;informing policy.&#8221;<br>Promoting Technological Solutions: Illustrating the ways in which e-government and artificial<br>intelligence can be used to counteract cyber-victimization.<br>Conclusion<br>The article concludes by highlighting the deep emotional toll that cyber-victimization takes as<br>well as the ways in which AI and e-government may help lessen these repercussions. In order to<br>solve the issues raised by cyberbullying, it emphasizes the necessity of interdisciplinary<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>approaches that integrate technology, policy, and mental health support. These interactions<br>should be further investigated in future studies in order to provide more potent preventative<br>and supportive measures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Muthuswamy, P., &amp; Esakki, T. (2024). Impact of Cybersecurity and AI\u2019s Related Factors on<br>Incident Reporting Suspicious Behaviour and Employees Stress: Moderating Role of<br>Cybersecurity Training. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 18(1), 86-102.<br>Article Link:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jesse Zinsou2\/19\/2025Article Review #1: Impact of Cybersecurity and AI\u2019s RelatedFactors on Incident Reporting Suspicious Behavior andEmployees Stress: Moderating Role of Cybersecurity TrainingThe article &#8220;Impact of Cybersecurity and AI\u2019s Related Factors on Incident Reporting SuspiciousBehavior and Employees Stress: Moderating Role of Cybersecurity Training&#8221; looks at howdifferent aspects of artificial intelligence (AI) and cybersecurity affect employees&#8217; stress&#8230; <\/p>\n<div class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jessezinsou\/article-review\/\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":29910,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jessezinsou\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/304"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jessezinsou\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jessezinsou\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jessezinsou\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/29910"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jessezinsou\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=304"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jessezinsou\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/304\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":305,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jessezinsou\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/304\/revisions\/305"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/jessezinsou\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=304"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}