One ethical issue that arises when storing electronic information about individuals is the law-abiding citizen fallacy. The law-abiding citizen fallacy is if there is on physical theft, then there is no crime involved. For example, if a citizen has their information online and someone hacks that system and has access to their personal information, then there isn’t a crime because they didn’t steal anything. Another ethical issue is the shatterproof fallacy, this is when a hacker gets on a machine, it can only hurt a few files on that system. For example, it seems okay for someone to get into a system and only damage a few files or get a little bit of information and then get out. Another ethical issue that arises is the candy-from-a-baby fallacy, this is very easy to do. For example, a hacker can get information from a person who is easily fooled or tricked. They tend to be the older people, for example if they are on the computer and see an ad or something that pops up from the FBI or their internet-service provider. The advertisement could be saying something about putting in their information because they didn’t pay their bill. Another example could be letting someone on your computer who says they are doing good but in reality, they are causing harm. Another ethical fallacy is the computer game fallacy, this is when a system is not protected is fair game. For example, if a company has personal information on their servers, like credit card information. Without any firewall protection, then it would be fair for someone to go into the server and get the information or copy it. This makes it fairly easy for a hacker to do damage and not get repercussions from it because it makes it seem only fair between both parties.