I like the analyze, investigate, and protect and defend. I don’t like collect and operate, securely provision, and oversee and govern. The analyze option is awesome because collecting information is important to secure a system. For example, if someone sees high traffic on a website, he/she may take precautions to redirect or stop users from spamming the site. In order to react, sufficient information must be analyzed to give meaning to the company. The investigate option is good because it requires specialized knowledge of technology to retrieve data on the field. For example, software is used to penetrate a phone’s security, allowing the hacker to search for incriminating evidence. The protect and defend option is good because a threat has to be stopped by defenses, so the company can continue to operate normally. For example, a phishing threat can be neutralized by using verified users or using software to detect phishing scams. Collect and operate is terrible because the information is just logged, but it is not broken down to the essential details of the threat. For example, an error report can be generated by someone, but it may not give an insight on the mechanics behind the issue. Securely provision is bad because I suck at visualizing and designing diagrams to implement, so I am the one who follows the instructions rather than create them. The oversee and govern option is bad because it does not require much skill because I want to make a big impact by doing the hard work. The management process can be achieved by anyone, so I want to challenge myself by not relying on  others to handle everything, but take charge over the issue itself.