First Article Review: De-radicalization of Indonesian Terrorism

The return of terrorist activities in Indonesia has inspired a legal research study on de-radicalization attempts. Terrorism is a major concern on a global scale. The emphasis is on methodically controlling and reducing radical attitudes and actions, which includes people who support terrorist ideas and even members of the community who are impacted by radical viewpoints.

 Linking to Social scientific Principles, By addressing the social phenomena of radicalization and terrorism, the topic is consistent with social scientific principles. It takes a thorough approach that probably incorporates sociological, psychological, and anthropological viewpoints as it explores the fundamental causes and cultural influences that give rise to radical beliefs

Research Questions or Hypotheses, The purpose of the study is to determine how well Indonesia’s current legislative frameworks in particular, Law Number 15 of 2003 abate acts of terrorism. Possible research topics include investigations of the inadequacies in legislation, difficulties in putting them into practice, and the unintentional outcomes that contribute to the spread of weapons 

Research Methods ,Legal research was conducted for the project, suggesting a doctrinal approach. A combination of qualitative and quantitative methodologies is shown by the data collecting from multiple primary and secondary sources. As part of the study approach, legal analyses, law interpretations, and maybe case studies are included.

Types of Data and Analysis, A wide range of data, including court papers, case studies, and perhaps interviews with subject matter experts or impacted parties, are suggested by the use of primary and secondary sources. The analysis, which looks at legislative provisions, how they are applied, and the flaws that have been found, is probably legal in nature. Relation to Ideas from PowerPoint Presentations: Ideas on counterterrorism and counter radicalization initiatives covered in PowerPoint presentations are probably pertinent. The essay may use these ideas as a starting point for criticism or as a way to supplement academic presentations’ theoretical frameworks with Indonesian real-world experiences and insights. Relation to Marginalized Groups: Although the article discusses societal issues in an indirect manner, it does not specifically address marginalized groups. Examining how de-radicalization initiatives take into account the range of socioeconomic origins and possible marginalization of particular groups that may be vulnerable to radical ideas is crucial. 

Overall Social Contributions. By pointing out legal gaps and making suggestions to strengthen deradicalization initiatives in Indonesia, the study greatly benefits society. Its conclusions offer regulatory agencies and legal professionals insightful information that could enhance counterterrorism tactics and increase public safety. IN summary, the de-radicalization study in Indonesia provides a thorough legal analysis together with useful suggestions. It applies social science concepts, assesses current legal systems, and offers insightful commentary for improving society especially in light of Indonesia’s counterterrorism initiatives.

Second Article : Creating measures to evaluate the cybersecurity awareness program’s efficacy

This research examines the evaluation of Cybersecurity Awareness (CSA) programs, an area that is closely related to ideas in the social sciences. It emphasizes how important it is to understand how people act, think, and feel about cybersecurity in order to effectively organize and evaluate awareness efforts. One of the basic tenets is that human behavior is influenced by a wide range of social factors, such as education, culture, and organizational dynamics. The study’s objective is to develop metrics for the evaluation of CSA programs, a procedure that calls for an understanding of and analysis of social behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions of cybersecurity among diverse target groups. The main focus of the study’s research questions and hypotheses is on creating appropriate metrics for evaluating CSA programs and determining how successfully they affect participants’ security-related behaviors, attitudes, and knowledge. In order to address the problem of the lack of generally acknowledged standards for assessing CSA programs, the study aims to contribute to the field by providing a rigorous approach to developing assessment metrics. In terms of research techniques, the study makes use of a methodical literature review to compile pertinent data and insights into current methodologies for assessing CSA programs. It also uses the four indicators for awareness evaluation provided by the European Literacy Policy Network (ELINET) as a foundation for developing measures. The study methodologies include evaluating several approaches to CSA program assessment and synthesizing data from the body of current literature. The information gathered for the study most likely comes from reports, questionnaires, and already published works on cybersecurity awareness and program assessment. Finding recurring themes, trends, and weaknesses in the current methods of CSA program evaluation is the analysis’s task.It is probable that the research use qualitative analysis techniques to analyze results and obtain understanding of the efficacy of various assessment measures. There are various connections between the ideas in the PowerPoint presentation and the article. Both stress the significance of ongoing assessment and improvement in cybersecurity procedures. The presentation’s discussion of the necessity of assessing CSA programs for efficacy is consistent with the article’s emphasis on developing metrics for CSA program evaluation. Additionally, both demonstrate how difficult it is to gauge knowledge, attitudes, and actions related to cybersecurity, highlighting the relationship between social dynamics and cybersecurity practices. The paper subtly discusses the difficulties underprivileged people could have in obtaining and using CSA services. It highlights the necessity of inclusive assessment techniques that take target groups’ various needs and circumstances into account. It does not, however, specifically address the difficulties or contributions that underrepresented groups have made to cybersecurity awareness, suggesting a possible topic for more study and thought. All things considered, the study’s contributions to society derive from its capacity to improve CSA programs’ efficacy through the provision of a methodical evaluation framework. The project intends to improve the outcomes of CSA programs and ultimately contribute to a better educated and cyber-aware society by identifying relevant metrics and evaluation methodologies. Furthermore, the study aims to meet the various demands of various populations by highlighting the significance of inclusivity in evaluation techniques, which may help to lessen disparities in cybersecurity awareness and behaviors.