{"id":204,"date":"2025-05-02T01:57:00","date_gmt":"2025-05-02T01:57:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/katherine-patton\/?p=204"},"modified":"2025-12-06T04:18:31","modified_gmt":"2025-12-06T04:18:31","slug":"pack-back-writing-assignment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/katherine-patton\/2025\/05\/02\/pack-back-writing-assignment\/","title":{"rendered":"Writing assignment #2"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Katherine Patton&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Biol294 Genetics&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Professor Rineheart-Kim&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>9\/12\/2025&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Writing assignment #2- Primary vs. Secondary Articles&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In writing research papers, and even in&nbsp;writing&nbsp;an original scientific paper, understanding types of sources is incredibly important.&nbsp;Scholarly can be organized by article type, using a system&nbsp;that\u2019s&nbsp;based off the author\u2019s\/authors\u2019 proximity to the collecting of data.&nbsp;Among these categories&nbsp;iclude&nbsp;primary sources, and secondary sources.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In summarization, Primary resources include an original document or object. This includes any immediate, first-hand account, with primary articles being the closest type of resource to the experiment\/event.&nbsp;According to Cornell&nbsp;University, in the sciences,&nbsp;Primary articles-also known as Empirical articles- are&nbsp;original scientific reports of findings. The site mentions that these articles often include introduction,&nbsp;methodology, results, discussion, and reference sections. These articles report original scientific&nbsp;observations and&nbsp;are usually conducted by the&nbsp;author(s) themselves.&nbsp;Cornell also notes that they are usually peer reviewed.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As&nbsp;stated&nbsp;previously, Cornell University states that primary scientific articles are often peer-reviewed- but the site&nbsp;diligently&nbsp;warns readers that there is a large distinction between an article being peer-reviewed, and an article being a review article. The difference&nbsp;between&nbsp;them&nbsp;is not only the contents, but also the type of&nbsp;resource&nbsp;they are.&nbsp;A review&nbsp;article&nbsp;summarizes and interprets data from&nbsp;primary&nbsp;articles and&nbsp;is always a secondary resource.&nbsp;Simply put,&nbsp;secondary articles&nbsp;are summarizations and interpretations of primary sources.&nbsp;More simply&nbsp;stated, they are one step away from primary sources.&nbsp;They are often easier to read, as they are usually broken down to be&nbsp;in a&nbsp;more widely&nbsp;digestible&nbsp;form.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Understanding the scientific peer review process is near-essential in reviewing and creating scientific articles over the course of an academic career.&nbsp;It is also important to know why peer reviewed articles are often selected over&nbsp;non peer&nbsp;review&nbsp;articles and&nbsp;why making that choice may improve one\u2019s reference quality to be used in academic settings.&nbsp;A Peer-reviewed article is an article that has-as the same entails- been reviewed by one or more peer reviewers. This process often follows a&nbsp;certain pattern, which many&nbsp;sources&nbsp;like&nbsp;Berkely University of California, as well as the Cornell University&nbsp;Library,&nbsp;&nbsp;summarize: 1.&nbsp;Scientist(s)&nbsp;complete a study and&nbsp;write&nbsp;a&nbsp;draft&nbsp;paper of their findings. They then&nbsp;submit&nbsp;it for publication- often to a scientific journal.&nbsp;2. The&nbsp;paper is read over and&nbsp;determined&nbsp;whether&nbsp;the subject is suited for the journal. The paper is then sent to a group of&nbsp;editors&nbsp;and peers- specialists&nbsp;working in&nbsp;the&nbsp;field&nbsp;of study that the paper is on.&nbsp;&nbsp;3. The reviewers provide feedback and their input, as well as their opinions on the paper\u2019s quality.&nbsp;This might include how original a paper is, the importance\/relativity of the findings, as well as if readers will enjoy the article.&nbsp;4.&nbsp;The&nbsp;reviewers will suggest the&nbsp;journal to&nbsp;publish or deny it based on their findings.&nbsp;Even&nbsp;if approved, the article and the reviewer\u2019s suggestions will often go back to the author for revisions and final edits before publishing&nbsp;5.&nbsp;Only articles that meet quality expectations for both peers and editors are to be published.&nbsp;The editor and journal, however, are to have the final say in publishing.&nbsp;&nbsp;(Different journals and publishers will have different standards and&nbsp;expectations,&nbsp;this&nbsp;is important&nbsp;to keep in mind when selecting articles).&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cResearch Guides: PRIMARY SOURCES: A Research Guide: Primary vs. Secondary.\u201d&nbsp;<em>Primary vs. Secondary &#8211; Primary Sources: A Research Guide &#8211; Research Guides at University of Massachusetts Boston<\/em>, University of Massachusetts Boston, 6 Dec. 2024, umb.libguides.com\/PrimarySources\/secondary#:~:text=Primary%20Sources%20are%20immediate%2C%20first,Raw%20Data.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cLibguides: Tutorial: Scholarly Literature Types: Primary vs. Secondary Articles.\u201d&nbsp;<em>Primary vs. Secondary Articles &#8211; Tutorial: Scholarly Literature Types &#8211;&nbsp;LibGuides&nbsp;at Cornell University<\/em>, Cornell University Library, 16 June 2021, guides.library.cornell.edu\/c.php?g=293669&amp;p=2004549.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cScrutinizing Science: Peer Review &#8211; Understanding Science.\u201d&nbsp;<em>Understanding Science &#8211; How Science REALLY Works&#8230;<\/em>, Berkeley University of California, 9 Sept. 2022, undsci.berkeley.edu\/understanding-science-101\/how-science-works\/scrutinizing-science-peer-review\/.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kelly, Jacalyn, et al. \u201cPeer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, &amp; A Survival Guide.\u201d\u00a0<em>EJIFCC<\/em>, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 24 Oct. 2014, pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC4975196\/.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Katherine Patton&nbsp; Biol294 Genetics&nbsp; Professor Rineheart-Kim&nbsp; 9\/12\/2025&nbsp; Writing assignment #2- Primary vs. Secondary Articles&nbsp; In writing research papers, and even in&nbsp;writing&nbsp;an original scientific paper, understanding types of sources is incredibly important.&nbsp;Scholarly can be organized by article type, using a system&nbsp;that\u2019s&nbsp;based&#8230; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/katherine-patton\/2025\/05\/02\/pack-back-writing-assignment\/\">Continue Reading &rarr;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":30387,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","wds_primary_category":1},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/katherine-patton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/katherine-patton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/katherine-patton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/katherine-patton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/30387"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/katherine-patton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/katherine-patton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":225,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/katherine-patton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204\/revisions\/225"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/katherine-patton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/katherine-patton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/katherine-patton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}