{"id":298,"date":"2025-04-12T14:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-04-12T14:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/kieraf\/?p=298"},"modified":"2025-04-29T21:13:46","modified_gmt":"2025-04-29T21:13:46","slug":"article-review-2-an-analysis-of-cybercrime","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/kieraf\/2025\/04\/12\/article-review-2-an-analysis-of-cybercrime\/","title":{"rendered":"Article Review #2: An Analysis of Cybercrime"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><br>In this article, Smith takes an objective view of cyberspace&#8217;s impact and<br>how that has affected cybersecurity and its effectiveness. They review how<br>cyberspace has \u201cunique characteristics\u201d that make evaluating the activity<br>different than in traditional spaces (Smith, 2024). By using an objective way to<br>deliver their investigation on human and cyber behaviors, it makes sense to<br>connect their message with mitigation, because they are trying to understand<br>the vulnerabilities and how they will impact communities, and they do this by<br>looking at the patterns and history of cyber vulnerabilities.<br>Although the format of these crimes has evolved, the motives of the crimes<br>are derived from the same interpersonal motives that have been discovered and<br>studied. Psychology and criminology have paved the way for discovering and<br>evolving an interdisciplinary understanding of cybersecurity, and \u201cencapsulates<br>the complexity of cybercrime\u201d (Smith, 2024). Because of the psychological<br>reasoning and understanding of crime, we can apply social learning theory (SLT)<br>and routine activities theory (RAT) when evaluating the motives and patterns of<br>cybercrime, retracing the steps that lead to the crime.<br>The challenges the research found were that both theories had limits that<br>didn\u2019t cover the full individual being\u2019s behavioral complexities. They look into<br>gratification theory to shed light on this neglect because it would give an<br>explanation to \u201cthe desire\u201d that comes along with many crime motives (Smith,<br>2024). In the boy of the article, they review different personality types like<br>narcissism and anti-social behavior found that they all feel a ned for gratification<br>of some kind. Because gratification comes in different forms for different people,<br>it acknowledges the complexity of an individual\u2019s behavior and how every person<br>will require different incentives that lead to different motives, such as money or<br>peer approval.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Conclusion<br>In Trot Smith\u2019s article, they take horse law, or psychology and criminology<br>principles, when discussing crimes, and suggest applying it to cyber crimes.<br>Their plan for finding a method that proves this theory is through \u201csynthesizing<br>concepts\u201d that would allow full coverage of an individual\u2019s personality, which will<br>give reason to motive for crime, and applies to the cyber world where crime is<br>made more accessible and allows for more complex motives (Smith, 2024).<br>Smith, T. PhD (2024). Integrated Model of Cybercrime Dynamics: A Comprehensive Framework<br>for Understanding Offending and Victimization in the Digital Realm. International Journal of<br>Cybersecurity Intelligence &amp; Cybercrime, 7(2), &#8211; . DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.52306\/2578-3289.1163<br>https:\/\/vc.bridgew.edu\/ijcic\/vol7\/iss2\/4<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In this article, Smith takes an objective view of cyberspace&#8217;s impact andhow that has affected cybersecurity and its effectiveness. They review howcyberspace has \u201cunique characteristics\u201d that make evaluating the activitydifferent than in traditional spaces (Smith, 2024). By using an objective way todeliver their investigation on human and cyber behaviors, it makes sense toconnect their message &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/kieraf\/2025\/04\/12\/article-review-2-an-analysis-of-cybercrime\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Article Review #2: An Analysis of Cybercrime<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":30546,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","wds_primary_category":4},"categories":[5,4],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/kieraf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/kieraf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/kieraf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/kieraf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/30546"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/kieraf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=298"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/kieraf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":299,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/kieraf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298\/revisions\/299"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/kieraf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=298"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/kieraf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=298"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/kieraf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=298"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}