{"id":127,"date":"2025-09-21T23:58:42","date_gmt":"2025-09-21T23:58:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/cyberimpact1\/?page_id=127"},"modified":"2026-05-05T22:17:58","modified_gmt":"2026-05-05T22:17:58","slug":"cyse-407","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/manuel-d-randolph\/cyse-407\/","title":{"rendered":"CYSE 201S Case Study"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center\">Case Study<\/h1>\n<p class=\"p1\">.Manuel Randolph<br \/>\n4\/21\/2026<br \/>\nCase study: Phishing attacks and Social Engineering<br \/>\nIntroduction<br \/>\nMajor cybersecurity risks that take use of human behavior rather than technical system flaws are<br \/>\nsocial engineering and phishing attacks. Phishing is a type of social engineering, according to the<br \/>\nCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), in which hackers use false emails,<br \/>\ntexts, or websites to deceive people into disclosing private information like passwords or<br \/>\nfinancial information. In order to create a false impression of respectability and urgency, these<br \/>\nattacks frequently appear as reliable institutions, increasing the possibility that users would react<br \/>\nwithout confirming authenticity (CISA, n.d.). Because social engineering is one of the most<br \/>\nsuccessful cyberattack techniques, it continues to be a problem because it preys on human trust.<br \/>\nAnalysis: Social Science Integration<br \/>\nThe success of phishing attacks can be explained by social science viewpoints. From a<br \/>\npsychological perspective, attackers take use of cognitive biases, including urgency, anxiety, and<br \/>\nfaith in authority. When messages seem to be from banks or employers, victims could react to<br \/>\nthem without giving them any thought. According to sociology, social engineering is based on<br \/>\nsocial relationships that are structured, like customer service encounters or organizational<br \/>\nstructures, where people are taught to submit to authoritative figures. According to Forbes,<br \/>\ncurrent social engineering attacks fall into a number of forms, including fraud, phishing, and<br \/>\nimpersonation, all of which mostly focus on influencing human behavior rather than breaching<br \/>\ntechnological systems (Vakolov, 2025). Anthropology also makes a contribution by<br \/>\ndemonstrating how cultural variations in trust and communication affect people&#8217;s susceptibility<br \/>\nto scams.<br \/>\nProposed Solution<br \/>\nBoth technical and human-centered approaches are required for effective control. Technically, to<br \/>\nreduce exposure to phishing attacks, enterprises should use domain verification tools, standard<br \/>\nemail filtering systems, and multi-factor authentication. Socially, cybersecurity awareness<br \/>\ntraining should inform consumers about typical manipulative methods including impersonation<br \/>\nand urgency. People can identify unusual messages in real-world situations by participating in<br \/>\nsimulated phishing exercises. By combining these strategies, a more robust defense system that<br \/>\ntakes into account both human behavior and technology is produced.<br \/>\nBarriers Mitigation<br \/>\nHuman mistake is an important challenge since even skilled people can fall for really convincing<br \/>\nattacks. The increasing complexity of phishing methods, such as customized and AI-generated<br \/>\nmessages, presents another difficulty. Organizations must regularly upgrade security systems and<br \/>\noffer ongoing training rather than one-time sessions to solve these problems. Response rates can<br \/>\nalso be increased by simplifying methods for reporting suspicious messages.<br \/>\nReflections<br \/>\nThe importance of combining cybersecurity and social sciences is shown by this case study.<br \/>\nTechnical defenses are crucial, but social engineering attacks still primarily target human<br \/>\nbehavior. Getting a deeper understanding of the psychological and sociological aspects of these<br \/>\nattacks will help prevent them more successfully.<br \/>\nReferences<br \/>\nCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. (n.d.). Avoiding social engineering and<br \/>\nphishing attacks.<br \/>\nhttps:\/\/www.cisa.gov\/news-events\/news\/avoiding-social-engineering-and-phishing-attacks<br \/>\nVakolov, A. (2025, March 29). 14 top social engineering attack types and their subcategories.<br \/>\nForbes.<br \/>\nhttps:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/alexvakulov\/2025\/03\/29\/14-top-social-engineering-attack-type<br \/>\ns-and-their-subcategories\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Case Study .Manuel Randolph 4\/21\/2026 Case study: Phishing attacks and Social Engineering Introduction Major cybersecurity risks that take use of human behavior rather than technical system flaws are social engineering and phishing attacks. Phishing is a type of social engineering, according to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), in which hackers use false emails,&#8230; <\/p>\n<div class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/manuel-d-randolph\/cyse-407\/\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":31502,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/manuel-d-randolph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/127"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/manuel-d-randolph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/manuel-d-randolph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/manuel-d-randolph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/31502"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/manuel-d-randolph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=127"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/manuel-d-randolph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/127\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":330,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/manuel-d-randolph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/127\/revisions\/330"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/manuel-d-randolph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=127"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}