Task 8 440W– Initial Submission
Task 8 440W-Final-Corrected Final
In this task I corrected APA issues.
Task 8: Findings-50 pts.
Findings
Role: Evaluator
Audience: Stakeholders
Format: APA Formatted Paper
Task: Develop an account of the findings of your evaluation.
Online Resources:
Writing Goals and Objectives http://practicum.usc.edu/docs/Tips_for_writing_Goals_and_Objectives.pdf
Findings (Key Concepts)-50pts
- Discuss the results of your evaluation.
- Identify what you obtained from your interviews, observations and/or surveys
- Identify the conclusions drawn from your evaluation results.
- Discuss the implications of your findings on the program and/or services.
- How can your findings impact the program?
- How can your findings impact the service?
- Is the influence positive or negative? Why?
- Make recommendations based off the results of your findings. Discuss how the recommendations can improve the program and why the stakeholders should consider them.
- Based on your recommendations develop clear goals and objectives for the program. (see goals and objectives resource)
- Identify a broad goal the program should implement.
- Identify objectives (action steps) that should be taken to meet this goal.
- Identify how your research articles support your findings, recommendations, goals and/or objectives.
Task 8 Rubric
CATEGORY | Exceed Standards | Meets Standard | Approach Standard | Needs Attention |
Results | Student adequately defines and summarizes the results of their evaluation efforts. | Student defines but has not summarized the results of their evaluation. | Student vaguely defines and/or summarizes the results of their evaluation. | Student fails to define and/or summarize the results of their evaluation. |
Conclusion | Student adequately develops conclusion based of results of evaluation. | Student mentions but has not fully developed conclusions that relates to the results of the evaluation. | Student vaguely develops conclusions and relate them to the results of the evaluation.. | Student fails to develop conclusions and relate them to the results of the evaluation. |
Implications | Student adequately discusses the implications of their evaluation. | Students mentions but has not fully developed the implications of their evaluation. | Student vaguely develops and identifies implications of their study. | Student fails to develop and identify implications of their study. |
Recommendations | Student adequately develops recommendations based off findings. | Student does not fully develop recommendations based off findings. | Student vaguely develops recommendations based off findings. | Student fails to develop recommendations. |
Goals and Objectives | Student adequately develops goals and objectives related to findings of the study. | Student does not fully develop goals and objectives related to the findings of the study. | Student vaguely develops goals and objectives based off the findings of the study. | Student fails to develop goals and objectives based off the findings. |
Quality of Information | Information clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. | Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples. | Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given. | Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic. |
Organization | Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and subheadings. | Information is organized with well-constructed paragraphs. | Information is organized, but paragraphs are not well-constructed. | The information appears to be disorganized. |
Sources | All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented in the desired format. | All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but a few are not in the desired format. | All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but many are not in the desired format. | Some sources are not accurately documented. |