{"id":257,"date":"2025-12-05T02:07:34","date_gmt":"2025-12-05T02:07:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/mharpercyse201\/?page_id=257"},"modified":"2025-12-05T02:10:37","modified_gmt":"2025-12-05T02:10:37","slug":"cyse201","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/mharpercyse201\/cyse201\/","title":{"rendered":"CYSE201"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Article Review #1<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article by Trinh, Dinh, and Tran (2025) examines the psychological traits of cybercriminals
and their broad implications for crime prevention. Using a systematic review of 1,200 studies
(with 45 meeting inclusion criteria), the authors bring attention to the connections between
psychology, criminology, and cybersecurity while giving recommendations for law, policy, and practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relation to Social Science Principles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cybercrime is not only a technological concern but also a social science concern because it
represents behavior, motivation, and social interaction online. The article connects criminology,
psychology, sociology, and law to explain cybercriminal behavior, applying theories like Routine
Activity and Deterrence Theory to digital contexts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Listed below is the research question, hypotheses, independent and dependent Variable.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Research question: What psychological traits do cybercriminals have and how can those traits improve cybercrime prevention?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hypotheses: Cybercriminals show specific psychological traits like narcissism, impulsivity, and tech proficiency that influence their behaviors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Independent Variables: Psychological traits such as narcissism, impulsivity, and technical proficiency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dependent Variables: Cybercrime behaviors, like hacking, phishing, and fraud.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Research Methods<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n


The writers used PRISMA guidelines to complete a literature review. They searched databases
like Web of Science and Google Scholar and applied strict criteria. NVivo and Excel were used for coding and thematic analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Data and Analysis<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The review combined qualitative and quantitative findings from past studies. Data types
included psychological assessments, case studies, and theoretical frameworks. The analysis
focused on identifying recurring traits, motivations, and trends in offender profiles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Connection to PowerPoint Concepts<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article connects with the PowerPoint concepts: Routine Activity Theory (crime occurs with a
motivated offender, suitable target, lack of guardianship), Deterrence Theory (punishment reduces crime), and privacy vs. security balance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevance to Marginalized Groups<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Marginalized groups often face the most cybercrime, like identity theft, financial fraud, and
privacy breaches. Study shows that victims may experience stress, anxiety, and reputational
harm. Low-income communities are vulnerable because they may lack access to strong cybersecurity protections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Contributions to Society<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The study contributes to society by advocating for integrated policies that combine
psychological insights, international cooperation, and legal reforms. The recommendations that
were given included improving offender profiling, enhancing cybersecurity education, and strengthening defenses for critical infrastructure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trinh et al. (2025) provided an important bridge between psychology and cybersecurity,
showing that cybercrime prevention requires understanding human behavior as much as
technology. By applying social science principles and recommending multi-level strategies, the
study highlights paths toward reducing risks and protecting society from evolving digital threats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trinh, D. T., Dinh, T. C. H., & Tran, T. N. K. (2025). Exploring the psychological profile of
cybercriminals: A comprehensive review for improved cybercrime prevention. International<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Journal of Cyber Criminology, 19(1), 114\u2013137.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/cybercrimejournal.com\/menuscript\/index.php\/cybercrimejournal\/article\/view\/452\/133<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Article #2<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Introduction \/ BLUF<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article investigates how bug-bounty programs (crowdsourced vulnerability
discovery) function economically and what factors influence the number of valid
vulnerability reports organizations receive. The bottom line: Bug-bounty programs are
shown to be cost-effective and accessible even for smaller firms, because the supply of
ethical hackers is relatively price-inelastic, and firm size or brand prominence has limited effect on report volume. <\/p>\n\n\n\n


Relation \/ Connection to Social-Science Principles<\/strong>
The study connects to several social-science principles:<\/p>\n\n\n\n