{"id":228,"date":"2021-04-26T15:04:30","date_gmt":"2021-04-26T15:04:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/moralesrebekah\/?p=228"},"modified":"2021-04-26T15:31:14","modified_gmt":"2021-04-26T15:31:14","slug":"j11-how-does-cybertechnology-impact-interactions-between-offenders-and-victims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/moralesrebekah\/2021\/04\/26\/j11-how-does-cybertechnology-impact-interactions-between-offenders-and-victims\/","title":{"rendered":"J11: How does cybertechnology impact interactions between offenders and victims?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>In our current society, it is apparent that victims are more likely to be offenders for cybercrime.&nbsp; Cybercrime results are suggesting these offenders participate in low0self control and routine activities.&nbsp; Crime will always be a thing, but the means of which or how it happens are everchanging constantly.&nbsp; These crimes are taking place in a digital context and space, whereas many traditional crimes were in forms of physical convergences with offenders and victims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Through cybercrime, it is pretty apparent that cybercrime offenders and victims are largely affected by low self-esteem, partaking in risky online routine activities, substance abuse, and different socio-economic status.&nbsp; Although cybercrimes are typically committed in a different context compared to traditional crimes, the relationship between the traditional offenders and victimization are the strongest for violent crimes.&nbsp; Per definition of transitional crimes, it requires physical interaction between victims and the offenders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Some of these interactions can be explained from the risks like low self-esteem or the way someone grew up.&nbsp; Some forms of cybercrime are easier to carry out, they may provide the serotonin or dopamine rush, instant gratification.&nbsp; These events can possibly provide multiple opportunities for the offender too, perhaps digital piracy.&nbsp; It is noted that these attacks were specific.&nbsp; The targeting for victims was random, usually resulting from the personal characteristics and behaviors of the victims.&nbsp; As stated before, those with low self-esteem.&nbsp; It would be easier to target them because they would not appear to be very confident with their standings, therefore easier to influence into doing something.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Another risk factor of online routine activity is the fact that it may enable digital conversation of such offenders and victims.&nbsp; It then may be associated with cybercrime offender-victim overlaps.&nbsp; It was reported that individual involvement of these cybercrime activities may significantly increase risk of victimization.&nbsp; On top of that, it may be correlated that increased time spent using internet connected devices, social media, email, may increase these risks for interpersonal victimization like online harassment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Marleen Weulen Kranenbarg, Thomas J. Holt &amp; Jean-Louis van Gelder\u00a0(2019)\u00a0Offending and Victimization in the Digital Age: Comparing Correlates of Cybercrime and Traditional Offending-Only, Victimization-Only and the Victimization-Offending Overlap,\u00a0Deviant Behavior,\u00a040:1,\u00a040-55,\u00a0DOI:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01639625.2017.1411030\">10.1080\/01639625.2017.1411030<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In our current society, it is apparent that victims are more likely to be offenders for cybercrime.&nbsp; Cybercrime results are suggesting these offenders participate in low0self control and routine activities.&nbsp; Crime will always be a thing, but the means of which or how it happens are everchanging constantly.&nbsp; These crimes are taking place in a &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/moralesrebekah\/2021\/04\/26\/j11-how-does-cybertechnology-impact-interactions-between-offenders-and-victims\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">J11: How does cybertechnology impact interactions between offenders and victims?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19836,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","wds_primary_category":0},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/moralesrebekah\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/moralesrebekah\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/moralesrebekah\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/moralesrebekah\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19836"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/moralesrebekah\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=228"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/moralesrebekah\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":233,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/moralesrebekah\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228\/revisions\/233"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/moralesrebekah\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=228"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/moralesrebekah\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=228"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/moralesrebekah\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=228"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}