For T.T, the Social Bond theory can be applied. The Social Bond theory, as proposed by Travis Hirschi, theorizes that the bonds an individual has with society decides the likelihood of them committing crime. Namely, T.T. fits the attachment component of the Social Bond theory. This is because of her son, who she desperately wants to get back after he was taken from her by Child Protective Services due to a mishap involving him accidentally drinking poisonous materials. It is this exact attachment and desire to obtain enough money for him that drives her for the rest of the movie. It is proven that T.T. had the strongest belief in the law out of the four girls, as she was the only one who abandoned a robbery and ran away from a bank when the rest of the girls were actively participating. However, her bond to society is broken when she realizes that her attachment to her son is stronger and she needs the money by any means necessary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Cleo can be an example of Social Control theory. Social Control theorizes about mechanisms that may serve as restraints for people who have the potential to become involved in criminal activity. Essentially, the ability to follow expected societal norms of behavior is what the theory focuses on, and Cleo lacks those norms in comparison to the rest of the girls. She was completely on board with robbing banks when the topic was brought up, and has a history of prior convictions according to a statement from the same police officer who talked to Frankie after the bank robbery that got her fired. Because of her bad history with the law accompanied with the fact that she was able to supply the group with guns due to her prior connections, it becomes evident that she lacks the social norms the rest all initially possessed. That explains why she becomes extremely emboldened to begin the crime spree because of her friend\u2019s struggles, as there isn\u2019t any moral boundary stopping her from doing so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Stony is another example of the Social Bond theory, as one of the new attachments she forms throughout the movie greatly influences her choices. Her belief in the law was shattered when the police force itself gunned down her brother, so it is relatively obvious as to why she began the bank robberies. Her attachment to her friends is highlighted as their situations also worsen, as Frankie changes after witnessing a traumatizing bank robbery alongside T.T\u2019s sadness upon losing custody of her only child. Her brother dying made her lose her reason to keep out of trouble, while her friends circumstances incentivized her participation in the crime spree.
Frankie also exemplifies the Social Control theory, but for a more visible reason than Cleo. During her time as a bank teller, she witnessed a bank robber execute a civilian right in front of her eyes. This is deeply traumatizing, and matters were only made significantly worse when she was accused of collusion with the men who robbed the bank. She was the one with the highest belief in society\u2019s laws prior to the incident, and the resulting effects on her led to a breakdown of the controls that would\u2019ve stopped her from considering crime in the first place. She would never fully recover from her trauma, as she quotes the accusation levied at her right before her death at the hands of the police.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
For T.T, the Social Bond theory can be applied. The Social Bond theory, as proposed by Travis Hirschi, theorizes that the bonds an individual has with society decides the likelihood of them committing crime. Namely, T.T. fits the attachment component of the Social Bond theory. This is because of her son, who she desperately wants… <\/p>\n