{"id":326,"date":"2024-10-08T20:07:18","date_gmt":"2024-10-08T20:07:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/nicholasgray\/?page_id=326"},"modified":"2024-10-08T20:12:55","modified_gmt":"2024-10-08T20:12:55","slug":"article-review-1","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/nicholasgray\/article-review-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Article Review #1"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Article Review #1<br>Cyberattacks, cyber threats, and attitudes toward cybersecurity policies<br>Nicholas T Gray<br>Old Dominion University<br>CYSE 201S: Cybersecurity &amp; Social Science<br>Diwakar Yalpi<br>10\/2\/2024<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Cyberattacks, cyber threats, and attitudes towards cybersecurity policies<br>After reviewing this article, I found that the principles of social science were a bit of parsimony,<br>determinism, objectivity, and skepticism. The researchers kept the experiment as simple as possible<br>because they had three different groups showed the same concept: a news video with various scenarios<br>to see what they would think about current cyber security policies. Following the hypothesis, if the<br>victims have never experienced a cyber attack, whether it was lethal or nonlethal, then they wouldn\u2019t<br>feel nearly as strongly as someone who did. The participant pool was objective considering \u201cOne<br>thousand twentytwo participants were randomly assigned to the three groups,\u201d and \u201cThe mean age of<br>the participants was 41 (SD = 14.81), and gender distribution of 49.96% male and 50.04% female.\u201d This<br>gives a different perspective from those who are younger, older, male, or female.<br>The study had a few hypotheses in question, which were whether or not the type of exposure to<br>a cyber attack had any influence on how much the victim was willing to support cybersecurity policies<br>and that people who are exposed to a lethal cyberattack will be more in favor of cybersecurity policies<br>than a person who was exposed to a nonlethal cyber-attack. The type of analysis used in this research<br>was a quantitative approach. The researchers conducted a controlled survey experiment by exposing the<br>participants to \u201csimulated news reports about major cyberattacks,\u201d as stated in the article.<br>The article ties into things I\u2019ve seen in the PowerPoint from class, for example, when<br>cyberattacks \u201cwanna cry\u201d and the \u201ccyber intrusion into the Democratic National Committee\u2019s<br>networks,\u201d were mentioned. The reason these attacks took place was most likely due to one of the<br>individual motives. The article mentions that \u201cCivilians who are exposed to political violence often suffer<br>from feelings of trauma, anxiety, and helplessness,\u201d this undoubtedly aligns with the psychological<br>consequences of victimization.<br>To conclude, this article was able to prove through its research that people are more inclined to<br>receive help or want better protection instilled after becoming a victim of a cyber-attack. It also showed<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>just how important it is to maintain awareness and has incited behavioral changes in people, assuming<br>they know how much a cyber attack can affect them. After reading this article, it became more apparent<br>that cybersecurity policies must constantly be reviewed so that they can be updated if and when they<br>become ineffective<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Article Review #1Cyberattacks, cyber threats, and attitudes toward cybersecurity policiesNicholas T GrayOld Dominion UniversityCYSE 201S: Cybersecurity &amp; Social ScienceDiwakar Yalpi10\/2\/2024 Cyberattacks, cyber threats, and attitudes towards cybersecurity policiesAfter reviewing this article, I found that the principles of social science were a bit of parsimony,determinism, objectivity, and skepticism. The researchers kept the experiment as simple as&#8230; <\/p>\n<div class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/nicholasgray\/article-review-1\/\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":29615,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/nicholasgray\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/326"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/nicholasgray\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/nicholasgray\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/nicholasgray\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/29615"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/nicholasgray\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=326"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/nicholasgray\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/326\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":334,"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/nicholasgray\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/326\/revisions\/334"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.wp.odu.edu\/nicholasgray\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=326"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}