The application of the principles of social science to cybersecurity offers an efficient way to comprehend and handle numerous aspects of information security. The principle of relativism is the philosophy that all things are related. For example, technological advancements lead to more complex vulnerabilities and threats, hence the need for more updated cybersecurity measures. Security measures should be adapted to consider different environments’ unique requirements and circumstances. The principle of objectivity highlights the value of objective and unbiased evaluation. In cybersecurity, one needs to analyze security risks and vulnerabilities to ensure that security choices are grounded on facts and data rather than personal beliefs. The principle of parsimony suggests that explanations should be as simple as possible. In cybersecurity, this principle promotes the development of simple, adequate security measures. Complex systems and policies can lead to confusion. The principle of empiricism emphasizes the reliance on empirical evidence, something that one can observe and experience. Security threats can be understood and addressed in cybersecurity by collecting and evaluating trends, vulnerabilities, and patterns, allowing for informed choices when creating security plans. Ethical neutrality implies that social scientists should conduct their study with neutrality and avoid imposing their views on their conclusions. In cybersecurity, the ability to make impartial judgments free from personal biases puts the security and privacy of people and organizations first. The principle of determinism suggests that previous events determine what happens next. In cybersecurity, specific attack patterns reflect the predictable way cyber threats occur, so understanding determinism can help professionals anticipate and avoid cyber attacks.