IT/CYSE 200T

Cybersecurity, Technology, and Society

Students in IT/CYSE 200T will explore how technology is related to cybersecurity from an interdisciplinary orientation.  Attention is given to the way that technologically-driven cybersecurity issues are connected to cultural, political, legal, ethical, and business domains. The learning outcomes for this course are as follows:

  1. Describe how cyber technology creates opportunities for criminal behavior,
  2. Identify how cultural beliefs interact with technology to impact cybersecurity strategies,
  3. Understand and describe how the components, mechanisms, and functions of cyber systems produce security concerns,
  4. Discuss the impact that cyber technology has on individuals’ experiences with crime and victimization,
  5. Understand and describe ethical dilemmas, both intended and unintended, that cybersecurity efforts, produce for individuals, nations, societies, and the environment,
  6. Describe the costs and benefits of producing secure cyber technologies,
  7. Understand and describe the global nature of cybersecurity and the way that cybersecurity efforts have produced and inhibited global changes,
  8. Describe the role of cybersecurity in defining definitions of appropriate an inappropriate behavior,
  9. Describe how cybersecurity produces ideas of progress and modernism.

Course Material Showcase

CYSE200T Analytical Paper – Xen Blunt-Jeffreys

This is an analysis paper that covers the social meanings and impacts of cybersecurity-related technical systems. My analysis covers: the change in the ethical framework of responsibility in the age of functional necessity and success; the shift in our relationship between technology and how we interact with the world; and an example of these concepts in a technical system, such as the SCADA systems.

Designing the Public Sphere_ Information Technologies and the Politics of Mediation – Xen Blunt-Jeffreys

This paper is a part of a class discussion on how we should regulate technology based on Peter-Paul Verbeek’s article, Designing the Public Sphere: Information Technologies and the Politics of Meditation. In this paper, I go over the difference of an internal, adaptive perception of our tech influenced world and an external, exclusive perception of our tech influenced world in regards to regulation.

The _Short Arm_ of Predictive Knowledge – Xen Blunt-Jeffreys

This paper is a part of a class discussion on how we should approach the development of cyber-policy and infrastructure in a new age of responsibility ethics in the wake of new technological developments. The information that I drew from to better respond to this discussion originated from Hans Jonas’ The “Short Arm” of Predictive Knowledge.