In gathering six documents for this annotated bibliography that address the issue of artificial intelligence’s influence on human creativity. Some contend that AI restricts creativity, while others claim it redefines it. It demonstrates a complicated and sophisticated connection between artistic expression and technology. There is a common worry expressed in all the sources that as AI technology advances, it will eventually replace human creativity in creative domains. According to several viewpoints, human-made accomplishments will eventually be surpassed by the possibility of AI-generated literature, art, and music. On the other hand, the divergent viewpoint contends that rather than taking the place of human innovation, AI can assist it. While it draws attention to the collaborative potential of AI and offers new insights that people might not have thought of without such software. Comparing an argument of artificial intelligence may foster creativity by allowing artists to delve deeper into a wide range of artistic mediums and concepts. It highlights that it can be used as a collaborator with inspiring new avenues for artistic exploration. Concern over the notable differences in AI’s contribution to the creative process is acknowledged by most authors. In the development of artistic expression, it might still be viewed as a threat that could lessen the need for human artists or even serve as a new kind of creativity. The constant debate about artificial intelligence and creativity in the future is depicted by the quick contrast between opportunity and dread. Overall, each source will help create an unbiased standpoint with logical reasons for why artificial intelligence is killing humans’ natural creativity.
Bender, Stuart. “Generative-AI, the Media Industries, and the Disappearance of Human Creative Labour.” Media Practice & Education, May 2024, pp. 1–18. EBSCOhost, https://doi-org.eztncc.vccs.edu/10.1080/25741136.2024.2355597.
The primary takeaway from this source is to highlight the obvious decline in human creative labor while bolstering the argument for the influence artificial intelligence has already had on the creative media and art industries. The walkout by writers and actors in the 20th century was discussed, demonstrating how human creativity was on par with artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence is not a substitute for these creative writers; rather, it is a tool to help. Using individuals who are already working in creative fields, this peer-reviewed paper refutes my claim that AI will replace them and instead aids in their brainstorming. As far as I can tell, though, it might vary based on the individual and their level of freedom of thought.
Haochen Sun. “The Law and Ethics of Ai Creativity.” St. John’s Law Review, vol. 98, no. 2, Apr. 2024, pp. 405–84. EBSCOhost, research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=8615cb7d-be10-32d3-b42b-852d1282f3c9.
This article would be excellent for comparing the ways in which artificial intelligence is stealing and passing off other people’s work as their own. It talks about the “biggest act of copyright theft in history,” which is when artificial intelligence uses these authors’ works to “generate” their own content without giving due acknowledgment. However, it discusses the Hollywood screenwriters’ strike of 2023, in which more than 15,000 writers demanded payment for using artificial intelligence in their creative works. I saw that the performers and screenwriters from Hollywood were in the same year, yet they both used AI to combat opposing viewpoints. In general, I believe that comprehension of the protests AI stealing writing may be viewed more creatively.
Lee, Hye-Kyung. “Rethinking Creativity: Creative Industries, AI and Everyday Creativity.” Media, Culture & Society, vol. 44, no. 3, Apr. 2022, pp. 601–12. EBSCOhost, https://doi-org.eztncc.vccs.edu/10.1177/01634437221077009.
This article discusses how AI could challenge conventional forms of human artistry to replicate human creativity in various fields. Nevertheless, because it talked about how AI is transforming the creative industry economically; this piece of writing caught my attention the most. In the business sector, this would be interpreted as the loss of jobs for creators who are no longer given priority. It is crucial to address the possibility that AI will eliminate jobs for those interested in this kind of work to save labor. This piece would undoubtedly be used to bolster my arguments while also illustrating the long-term consequences of attempting to replace people with artificial intelligence.
Rouser, Sydney. “Unfair Competition in the Creative Industries: The Impact of Ai Scraping.” Tennessee Journal of Law & Policy, vol. 16, no. 3, Apr. 2024, pp. 134–76. EBSCOhost, https://doi-org.eztncc.vccs.edu/10.70658/1940-4131.1169.
This peer-reviewed article examines how AI algorithms affect content production, with a particular emphasis on AI scraping. how AI systems collect different volumes of online content. When people use artificial intelligence to generate ideas, this is crucial because the final product could not be unique but rather a combination of ideas from other creators. Artistic content is repeated endlessly till we have not developed our ability to think freely. With the use of this information, I could challenge the claim that artificial intelligence is regressing human society rather than encouraging creativity. Overall, the information I have gathered from this source could really get the audience thinking before they use AI to brainstorm.
Sinha, Charu, et al. “Maximizing Generative AI Benefits with Task Creativity and Human Validation.” Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management, vol. 24, no. 2, May 2024, pp. 112–22. EBSCOhost, https://doi-org.eztncc.vccs.edu/10.21818/001c.122147.
This peer-reviewed source compares the experiences of white-collar workers of generative artificial intelligence in the workplace. It provides a more comprehensive view of how AI may affect daily life or the workplace. There are differing opinions on the matter; some claim that it increases productivity, while others caution that it can have the opposite effect. Both proponents and opponents of the idea that artificial intelligence is stifling creativity share this opinion. By describing their firsthand experiences, it improves comprehension of the industry that has truly encountered the problems. This source will assist me in creating a more thorough illustration of its advantages and disadvantages.
Wall-Andrews, Charlie, et al. “ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: Its Opportunities & Threats in Creative Industries.” Canadian Musician, vol. 45, no. 1, Jan. 2023, pp. 38–39. EBSCOhost, research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=ae48df7f-ece6-352e-816d-7af24212f192
Over the past ten years, artificial intelligence has had an enormous impact on creative industries, as this article explores. It shows danger as well as opportunity. Regardless of your opinion on whether artificial intelligence is empowering or destroying mindsets, this peer-reviewed data supports the debate on both sides. Additionally, it provides examples of advertisements that used and did not use artificial intelligence. The commercial that detailed the methods taken to develop the final product over the course of several hours was broken. However, in just a few minutes, they employed AI-generated music software to create a complete commercial. Although it does not hold a prejudiced opinion regarding AI, it is educational and contains reliable and pertinent facts that would support my research.