ODU Logo

CYSE201S

Arvin Thornton

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Home
  • Blog

Article 2 Review

The article “Cybercrime Risks in Cross-Border Investment Contracts” by Hamza E. Albaheth explores the intersection of technology, law, and economics within the globalized digital economy. This topic directly relates to social science principles because it examines how human institutions, law, business, and international governance, all adapt to the social and technological changes brought by digitalization. It reflects how cybercrime not only disrupts financial markets but also challenges legal systems designed around traditional human agreements, emphasizing the social nature of trust, cooperation, and regulation.

The research question focuses on how cybercrime affects cross-border investment contracts and whether current legal frameworks effectively address these digital threats. Albaheth’s hypothesis suggests that current international laws and arbitration mechanisms are insufficient to manage the rise of complex, borderless cyberattacks that compromise contractual integrity and investor trust.

The research methods include qualitative case study analysis, examining real-world examples of cyberattacks that disrupted international investments, and a comparative legal review of arbitration frameworks such as UNCITRAL and ICSID. The data used are derived from legal documents, treaty analyses, and reported case incidents. Albaheth applies thematic and doctrinal analysis to assess gaps in existing legal responses.

This study connects to class concepts such as globalization, institutional trust, social regulation, and digital governance. It demonstrates how law as a social institution evolves to manage new risks created by human behavior in cyberspace.

The article also touches on marginalized groups, particularly smaller nations and less-developed economies that lack advanced cybersecurity infrastructure. These groups face unequal exposure to cyber risks and have limited legal resources for restitution.

Finally, the societal contribution of the study lies in its proposal for harmonized international cybersecurity standards, cyber-insurance mechanisms, and stronger digital evidence frameworks. These are key steps toward protecting both economic stability and global equity in the digital age.

Reference
Albaheth, H. E. (2025). Cybercrime risks in cross-border investment contracts: Legal challenges and regulatory responses in commercial and investment law. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 19(1), 138-153.

athor015

Author archive

December 4, 2025

Uncategorized

Previous post Next post

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest posts

  • Why do you think individuals don’t report cybercrime victimization?
  • What does economics have to do with cybersecurity?
  • Career Paper
  • Two research questions that researchers might address related to the social aspects of cybersecurity 
  • 12-year-old Hacker and Cyber Security Expert

Text widget

These widgets are displayed because you haven't added any widgets of your own yet. You can do so at Appearance > Widgets in the WordPress settings.

Categories

  • Uncategorized

Latest posts

  • Why do you think individuals don’t report cybercrime victimization?
  • What does economics have to do with cybersecurity?
  • Career Paper
  • Two research questions that researchers might address related to the social aspects of cybersecurity 
  • 12-year-old Hacker and Cyber Security Expert

Text widget

These widgets are displayed because you haven't added any widgets of your own yet. You can do so at Appearance > Widgets in the WordPress settings.

© 2026 CYSE201S — Powered by WordPress

Original theme by Anders Noren | Adapted by ITS — Up ↑

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Accept