This article analyzes Jordan’s Electronic Crimes Act 2023, focusing on its effects on freedom of expression and potential misuse against marginalized groups. It relates to social science principles, particularly in sociology and political science, as it examines how laws affect social behavior and power dynamics. The research questions include: What does character assassination mean under Article 16? How might Article 24 limit freedom of expression? These questions are essential for understanding the law’s impact on individual rights and public discourse. The article suggests that vague language in these articles could lead to arbitrary enforcement, especially against political dissenters and activists. The study uses qualitative analysis by examining the text of the Electronic Crimes Act and related literature on cybercrime and freedom of expression. It includes case studies and examples to show the potential outcomes of the law. This approach helps reveal the complex effects of the legislation and how different groups might react.
Data analysis includes examining legal texts, expert opinions, and accounts from affected individuals. The author combines these findings to argue that while the Act aims to fight cybercrime, it could threaten freedom of speech. This analysis aligns with social science methods that focus on understanding societal issues in context. The article connects to key concepts from class, such as power dynamics, social justice, and human rights. It highlights how laws shape social behavior and the need to protect marginalized voices in political discussions. The Act’s potential to silence dissent shows broader challenges related to governance and civil liberties.
Additionally, the article discusses how the Electronic Crimes Act impacts marginalized groups like women, journalists, and activists by limiting their ability to express themselves. This connection is important as it emphasizes the need to protect diverse voices in a democracy.
The study identifies several societal contributions, including the need for clearer definitions in the law to prevent misuse and for accountability for law enforcement. By advocating for these changes, the article contributes to discussions about balancing security and individual rights in the digital age.
In conclusion, this article offers valuable insights into the Electronic Crimes Act 2023, highlighting its complexities and potential effects on freedom of expression in Jordan. It stresses the importance of a legal framework that protects individual rights while addressing cybercrime, ultimately leading to a fairer society.


Works Cited
View of Cybercrime Laws in Jordan and Freedom of Expression: A Critical Examination of the Electronic Crimes Act 2023 (cybercrimejournal.com)