Week 1 – Entry – NICE Farmwork:
The NICE Workforce Framework describes a variety of cybersecurity positions and competencies. In line with the “The Blacklist” series, I’d be interested in employment involving cyber threat intelligence and analysis. I’d enjoy the challenge of deciphering cyber risks, just as Reddington does while navigating complicated webs of information. Incident Response is another topic of interest, similar to the show’s theatrical handling of criminal events. Conversely, occupations mainly focused on Privacy Compliance may be less enticing since they lack the adrenaline of tracking and repelling threats, which is reminiscent of the dramatic and action-packed aspect of “The Blacklist.” Overall, my career goals would be in the dynamic worlds of threat analysis and incident response, which reflect the series’ suspenseful and strategic features.
‘The trick to not feeling powerless is to do something. Anything.’
Raymond Reddington
Week 2 – Entry – “Decrypting Cybersecurity: Unveiling Scientific Strategies in ‘The Blacklist'”:
In “The Blacklist,” the character Raymond Reddington’s strategic and analytical approach connects scientific ideas to cybersecurity. To navigate the complicated realm of cyber dangers, Reddington uses deductive reasoning, data analysis, and predictive modeling, much like a great scientist. He gathers intelligence, detects trends, and anticipates adversaries’ moves in the same way that a scientist does while testing hypothesis. Cybersecurity is fundamentally based on scientific approaches such as encryption algorithms, anomaly detection, and risk assessment. Reddington’s calculated approaches reflect the scientific precision required in cybersecurity, where knowing the threat picture, analyzing vulnerabilities, and devising responses are critical. This portrayal in “The Blacklist” highlights the connection between science and cybersecurity, emphasizing the importance of thorough inquiry and smart thought in protecting digital landscapes from emerging threats.
“I see the world for what it is, a system of systems, precise, predictable. Science, in its most advanced form, is indistinguishable from magic.”
Raymond Reddington, “The Blacklist”
Week 3 – Entry – “PrivacyRights.org” Research Study:
Researchers have the ability to use freely accessible data breaches information to carry out in-depth investigations across multiple fields. They can spot patterns and trends, gauge the effect on people and organizations, and gauge how well security solutions are working by examining compromised data. The development of mitigation methods and the improvement of cybersecurity policies and technologies are guided by insights obtained from breaches. To gain a deeper understanding of the interrelated risks present in the digital sphere, researchers might also investigate correlations between spam, identity theft, and data breaches. Examining compromised data is essential for threat and attribution research, supporting the continuous endeavor to strengthen cybersecurity protocols worldwide.
Week 4 – Entry -“Tech and Human Needs: Navigating Maslow’s Hierarchy in the Digital Era”:
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs and technology experiences are closely related. Maslow addresses needs related to physiology, safety, love and belonging, esteem, and self-actualization. Digital tools address physiological demands by providing vital resources, such as online grocery shopping during the pandemic. Control and security are fostered by secure transactions and home security systems that guarantee safety requirements. Apps for communication and social media promote relationships across distances by nurturing a sense of love and belonging. It becomes essential to use websites like LinkedIn to express your self-worth. Lastly, employing cutting-edge digital tools like language applications is necessary to reach self-actualization. Thinking back on these interactions shows how, within Maslow’s theory, technology has a variety of effects on well-being.
Week 5 – Entry – “Unraveling the Complex Web of Intentions Behind Hacking Activities”:
1- For the money, 2- Revenge, 3- Political, 4- Recognition, 5- Entertainment, 6- Multiple reasons, 7- Boredom.
The rating represents an assessment of cybercrime motivations based on occurrence, impact, and underlying causes. “For money” topped the list, recognizing financial gain as a primary motivator, which is confirmed by insights into spending behaviors. “Revenge” follows, propelled by strong emotions, particularly in cases involving revenge porn. “Political” motives come in third, with hacktivism adding to cybersecurity issues for political objectives. “Recognition” is fourth, emphasizing the need for recognition, as evidenced in activities such as the DDoS attack on an election. “Entertainment” is less common but recognized for its excitement or challenge. “Multiple reasons” are seen as complex, making it difficult to identify a single purpose. “Boredom” ranks last, recognizing its low incidence and influence in comparison to more broad motivations, as illustrated in the link about cyberbullying and online grooming.
Week 6 – Spotting fake sites.
- Amaazon.com VS Amazon.com > first one (Amaazon.com) is a fake site that leads customers to believe they are buying directly from Amazon.com. However, Amaazon.com is a scam site that only steal the customers money. (Typo squatting)
- Yahoo.com VS Yahoo.org > first one (Yahoo.com) is a legit browsing site that users can utilize it fulfill their needs. However, Yahoo.org is a fake domain that goals is to steal user’s PII.
- besharl.in also seen under Beshark (World Wide Infotech) is a job scam.
beshark.edu that request’s peroneal information such as phone number and social security number so the adversary could commit identify fraud.
Week 7: Create a meme that reflects an Indvidual’s mind.
This meme reflects a man thought regarding how unsafe he feels regarding his laptop security. The pic shows the man thinking about how he can apply safety measures to fully secured his laptop.
He is also thinking about how he can “Decrypt the mysteries of cybersecurity, one coffee at a time.”
Week 8: Navigating the Cybersecurity Landscape: Media Influence and Digital Resilience
I considered the media’s tremendous influence on our perceptions about cybersecurity. The media acts as a powerful mediator, reducing difficult technological matters for general consumption. However, this reduction can occasionally mislead the reality of cybersecurity, which is complex and varied. The words employed, such as “hacking” and “data breaches,” can lead to oversimplification, potentially instilling panic or apathy.
The media’s involvement in shaping narratives about cybersecurity incidents is critical, as it influences public opinion and policy decisions. The inclination to focus on large attacks may obscure broader issues such as internet privacy and the value of cybersecurity education.
As media consumers, we must approach cybersecurity news with skepticism, realizing that sensationalism has the potential to undermine our trust in digital systems. On a positive note, media coverage has the opportunity to educate and inform by highlighting successful cybersecurity activities and breakthroughs in the sector.
To summarize, my views highlight the fragile link between the media and our knowledge of cybersecurity. Being discerning consumers is critical, and I hope that the media strives for honesty, balance, and the promotion of a digital resilience culture. Balancing these aspects is difficult, but necessary for navigating our modern environment.
Week 10: Social Media Disorder Scale
Tobi-Goldfus-Social-Media-Disorder-ScaleEntry 10: Exploring the Landscape of Social Cybersecurity: Insights and Reflections.
Lt. Col. David M. Beskow and Kathleen M. Carley’s enlightening article “Social Cybersecurity: An Emerging National Security Requirement” provided me with a thorough understanding of the field of social cybersecurity. The paper clearly shows how technology interacts with human behavior, societal dynamics, and national security.
Here are the ideas I learned from the article:
Social cybersecurity is the study and forecasting of cyber-driven changes in human behavior, social implications, and political landscapes, with a focus on “cognitive hacking.” Going beyond traditional cybersecurity, it investigates how humans use technology to control others, taking into account vulnerabilities in human cognition and sociocultural frameworks. This field has seen both state and nonstate actors use information warfare to shape narratives, alter realities, and foment strife, utilizing technology’s worldwide reach. As information has risen to become a powerful component of state power, influencing diplomatic, military, and economic spheres, control over narrative shaping and information dissemination has become critical. The Russian media blitzkrieg is a case in point, demonstrating the disruptive effects of information operations on nations, alliances, and institutional trust, emphasizing the need for strong tactics and policies.
Reflecting on the article, I see that warfare has evolved beyond physical engagements to include mental and network dimensions. This emphasizes the significance of lifelong learning, interdisciplinary collaboration, and proactive efforts to protect society in the digital era.
Entry 11: Analyzing Social Dynamics in Cybersecurity Roles: Intersecting Job Realities with Societal Trends.
The cybersecurity analyst job description exposes a number of societal topics that overlap with the role’s tasks. To begin, the emphasis on being the first line of defense against cyber threats emphasizes society’s reliance on technology and the importance of protecting individuals, organizations, and governments from bad actors that exploit digital weaknesses. The notion of working 24/7 and maybe undertaking graveyard shifts emphasizes the cultural change toward a worldwide, always-connected society in which cyber threats can strike at any moment, necessitating ongoing attention and response. Furthermore, the debate of salaries and location-based pay reflects broader socioeconomic concerns such as cost of living and job market rivalry, which influence people’s decisions about where to work and how to advance their careers. The requirement for certifications and networking to enter the field emphasizes the significance of professional groups and industry standards in defining how individuals enter and advance in the cybersecurity profession within the larger social and economic context.
ArticelR-2Week 12: Notification of Data Breach Incident
Glasswasherparts.com_Journal Entry 13: Economic Insights into Bug Bounty Policies: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hacker-One Data
Kiran Sridhar and Ming Ng’s paper “Hacking for good: Leveraging HackerOne data to develop an economic model of Bug Bounties” provides a thorough examination of bug bounty laws and their financial effects. The benefits of bug bounty programs in cybersecurity are highlighted in the literature study, which offers a strong foundation for businesses who are having trouble finding cybersecurity personnel and effectively detecting vulnerabilities.
The findings are insightfully discussed, highlighting important variables that affect bug bounty program success. This article clarifies the intricate relationship between cybersecurity and economics in bug bounty programs by examining the program age, industry effects, brand profile, bounty amount, time to resolution, revenue impact, scope, and new program dynamics analyzed by the authors.
The price elasticity of hackers is one interesting discovery that suggests bug bounty programs can still be beneficial to organizations with limited resources. The discourse surrounding industry impacts and brand image emphasizes the significance of sector-specific factors and the function of reputation in drawing in ethical hackers.
The findings are more credible because of the article’s approach, which makes extensive use of data analysis and instrumental factors. But the study’s acknowledgement of its limits and possible biases promotes openness and calls for more investigation into this developing topic.
All things considered, this paper makes a substantial contribution to our understanding of the financial foundations of bug bounty programs and how they affect cybersecurity procedures. Policymakers, cybersecurity experts, and academics interested in maximizing bug bounty programs for efficient risk management and threat mitigation will find it to be a useful resource.
Entry 14: Illegal things to do online:
Five primary infractions include using unapproved streaming and torrent services (which violate copyright), sharing personal information without authorization (which compromises privacy and puts one at risk), cyberbullying and trolling (which can have negative emotional and legal effects), and recording VoIP calls without authorization (which violates privacy laws). These deeds injure people, companies, and society as a whole and transgress legal, moral, and ethical boundaries.
Furthermore, these violations affect not just the directly affected individuals but also have wider societal implications. Unauthorized content distribution and copyright violations reduce the incentives for artists and producers to create new works, which has an impact on artistic and cultural innovation. Cyberbullying and privacy violations exacerbate an environment of distrust and anxiety on the internet, which undermines the possibility of constructive social connections and the development of virtual communities. Violating privacy regulations and participating in illicit activities on the internet can weaken public confidence in digital technologies and platforms, impeding their potential advantages for global connectivity, communication, and commerce. As a result, dealing with these grave infractions is essential for maintaining moral and legal obligations as well as for promoting a more secure and long-lasting online environment for all.
Journal Entry 15: Digital Forensics.
Salon’s journey into digital forensics, as detailed in the entry, is fascinating. Originally trained as accountants, they fell into the field of IT and digital forensics by happenstance, motivated by their enthusiasm in technology. This job change exemplifies the multidisciplinary nature of digital forensics, which allows people with varied backgrounds, such as accounting and IT, to discover their specialty.
Salon’s overview of digital forensics work highlights the complexity and meticulousness required in this discipline. Contrary to popular belief, forensic investigators do not work in sterile lab surroundings; instead, they conduct covert operations, make late-night workplace visits, and carefully collect digital evidence. The emphasis on maintaining data integrity and ensuring legal admissibility of evidence underscores the importance of professionalism and attention to detail in digital forensics.
Furthermore, the speaker’s comparison of historical forensic tools and storage systems to current ones demonstrates the rapid improvements in the digital forensics landscape. Digital forensics has grown dramatically to keep up with technical advancements, from floppy disks to high-capacity storage and quick data capture technologies.
Salon’s case study gives a practical understanding of the problems that digital forensic consultants face, as well as the strategies used to investigate and respond to cybersecurity incidents. The case study’s emphasis on technological expertise, investigative abilities, and legal understanding highlights digital forensics’ interdisciplinary nature and vital significance in cybersecurity and law enforcement.
Overall, Salon’s path and experiences in digital forensics highlight the field’s dynamic and ever-changing character, where professionals from various backgrounds work together to solve complicated cybercrime cases and ensure digital security.