The first principle of science, Relativism, says that all things are related. In other words, systems such as the education economic, and political health systems would all inevitably bring up cyber security again because of how heavily we rely on technology. Objectivity is studying topics in a value-free manner. It focuses on the facts not favoritism. Science is not opinion or POV based. Being objective in the cyber security field is only natural. When the time comes for resources to be used for a certain issue, it should be decided whether or not it’s the best move objectively. Having a bias is irrelevant. Parsimony is a term that means explaining something as simply as possible especially scientific cyber terms or related questions to it. It would come down to research and some pretty common generalizations for more broad questions. Empiricism is only studying behavior with our human senses being our sight, smell, hearing sight, and touch. This kind of research must be done as it cannot be based on gut feelings and biases when it comes to the revelations of cyber security. Ethical Neutrality is when scientists must stay ethical while doing their research. With everything, there are certain lines you shouldn’t cross. At the very least some thought should go into it. In cyber security, how far should we go when monitoring people’s activities on the web for instance? Determinism is behavior caused by preceding events. When we ask specific questions that are problems about internet fraud, cyber hygiene, and passwords, there’s usually a cause. Skepticism is questioning critically rather than accepting something immediately, for example researching evidence to see if it’s true. In cyber security, it’s best to be as thorough as you can with details about breaches and incidents so having skepticism and asking questions could work in your favor.