Tag Archives: Gene Loving

Fans from the 1970s, They’re Just Like Us! An Exploration of Fan Culture with the Gene Loving/AGL Production Collection

By Lenaya Luckett: UNIV168 Intern and Mellon Grant Recipient 

We love the Osmonds envolope
Envelope containing a letter to Gene Loving from a young fan of the Osmonds

The 1970s and 2010s have more in common than some might think, and no, it isn’t the fashion. The colorfully coordinated outfits of the 70s drastically outperform the skinny-jean trend of the 2010s. Despite these stylistic differences, one detail remains strikingly similar: the dynamic between fans and artists.  It’s easy to assume that this level of devotion — letters bordering on fan fiction, imagined personal connections, or the belief that one might actually have a chance with a favorite band member — is a product of the digital age. The boy band craze of the 2010s is often treated as something unprecedented, fueled by social media platforms like Instagram and Tumblr, where fans could post in real time, craft elaborate narratives, and experience seemingly intimate interactions with their favorite performers. However, history suggests otherwise. 

During my internship with Old Dominion University’s Special Collections and University Archives department, I had the opportunity to view the Gene Loving Collection. Loving was a well-known concert promoter and Radio/TV personality in the Hampton Roads area, leading many fans to view him as a direct connection to their favorite artists and bands. While it was easy to find the address of Loving’s workplace, the same could not be said for locating where their favorite musicians lived. As a result, Loving became a perceived bridge between fans and the artists they adored. Fans- including a young girl from Norfolk and the Girls Club- sent him heartfelt letters and petitions, hoping he could bring them closer to the celebrities they idolized.

During my research in this collection, I came across a letter written by a thirteen year old fan of the Osmond Brothers who was very convinced that the members of the boy band knew who she was. Seemingly, the original letter went unanswered, prompting the eager fan to send it once more. Included with her letter was a passionately written fictional story about a teenage girl meeting her favorite celebrity. Today, writing like this would fall under the category of fan fiction – stories created by fans about popular characters or public figures. She titled her story “A Week of Enchantment.” 

letter attached to fanfic
The front page of the letter to Gene Loving from a young fan of the Osmonds

Reading this story immediately brought to mind more recent forms of fan fiction from the 2010s. The narrative closely resembles popular stories from that era, like those in which a fan is “sold to” the band One Direction by a parent. In her story, the fairytale week starts off by her winning a contest that earns her a week with The Osmonds. The young author writes that, despite being only thirteen years old, she arrives at the airport to meet the boy band without parental supervision, accompanied only by disc jockey Gene Loving, because he coordinated the contest. 

As the story unfolds, the week develops like a carefully scripted teen romance, with the opportunity to attend all three Norfolk performances by her favorite band not even being the highlight. While attending one of the shows, the narrative describes Donny Osmond sweetly singing his hit songs “Sweet and Innocent” and “Puppy Love” directly to her. The young author of this story suggests that these songs perfectly capture her “week of enchantment,” emphasizing that although they may be too young, their feelings are genuine. By the end of the story, the band’s ongoing tour and the end of the contest week force the two teenagers to say goodbye. Rest assured, the story does not end before indulging in several classic young-adult romance clichés: a chaperoned amusement park date, a movie, and a kiss on the front porch.

come to the scope (norfolk girls club)
Letter from Norfolk teens petitioning to get The Osmonds to play at the Norfolk Scope

While one teenage girl was imagining her fairytale at home, other Norfolk teens were channeling their devotion into something more tangible. After The Osmonds performed three shows at the Hampton Roads Coliseum on April 3, 1972, local fans were left wanting a performance of their own at Norfolk’s Scope. Though the distance between Hampton and Norfolk was relatively short, attending the Coliseum shows required crossing the water — at least a thirty-minute drive through the tunnel. Today, that commute may seem minor. In 1972, however, for a fan base composed largely of teenagers dependent on parents for transportation — and with concerts scheduled during the school and work week — the journey presented a significant barrier. Even so, this did not stop young fans from advocating for the show they believed they deserved. 

Rather than accept defeat, Norfolk’s young fans organized. The effort began with the local Girls’ Club, whose members drafted a letter to Gene Loving — the promoter responsible for the band’s Hampton performances — and attached a petition signed by 505 supporters. In their letter, the girls emphasized their dedication: they choreographed dances to the brothers’ songs and knew every lyric by heart. The petition represented impressive grassroots enthusiasm, especially considering it required gathering physical signatures one by one. Despite getting over 500 signatures, the girls fell way short of the capacity of The Scope, which was 13,000. Even if they had managed to get that many people to sign their petition, realistically, it couldn’t have happened. The Scope didn’t open until November 12, 1971, which left little to no time to plan, especially when completion dates aren’t set in stone. Planning and preparation-wise, the show at the Coliseum made the most sense. Their petition may not have brought the Osmonds to Norfolk, but it showcased the resourcefulness and devotion that would define fan culture for decades to come.  

osmonds fan chant
A chant written by the Norfolk Girl’s Group to try and get The Osmonds to come to the Norfolk Scope.

My research showed me that while the world is constantly changing, one aspect of fandom has remained consistent: reactions to boy bands. Whether it’s the 1970s or the 2010s, these groups inspire some of the most creative and dedicated fans. Older generations often argue that modern fans are excessively enthralled, yet history shows that the passion is timeless — only the delivery system has evolved. In the 1970s, fans mailed stories to promoters in hopes they would reach a favorite band member; decades later, fans share their devotion online or at meet-and-greets, sometimes publicly, sometimes anonymously. Devotion to an artist or band has never looked one way. Some write stories. Others organize petitions. Still, regardless of decade or method, they share one constant motivation: a deep love of the music — and the people who create it. 

Resources:

Link to the Gene Loving/LGA Productions Collection Finding Aid

Bringing 60s and 70s Pop, Rock and R&B to Hampton Roads: Featuring the Gene Loving/AGL Collection Digital Exhibition by Allan Blank Curator of Music Special Collections Maddie Dietrich

The Price You Pay: An Exploration of Concert Culture in Hampton Roads Through the Gene Loving Collection

by Lenaya Luckett, UNIV 068 Intern and Mellon Grant Recipient

9ac2b756-1b31-4643-a23f-93b0df30ca1a
Image Caption: Jackson Five Concert Tickets – Hampton Roads Coliseum, July 18, 1971

Beyoncé’s three-act project, which is seemingly themed around celebration and reclamation of black music genres, was a pivotal moment for me as a history student who couldn’t find my niche. It may seem foolish to claim that a celebrity had such a huge impact on my life, but it’s true. The first two acts, Renaissance and Cowboy Carter, introduced me to music and its role in history. I learned how easy it is for a genre to be pioneered by one group and later overtaken by another. At the height of my interest in music history, I began interning at Old Dominion’s Special Collections and University Archives. There, I found the Gene Loving collection, which slightly altered my course direction.

The Gene Loving collection contains business records from AGL (A Gene Loving) Productions, a Hampton Roads concert booking agency active from 1962 to 1975 and responsible for bringing major acts like James Brown, Sonny & Cher, and Jimi Hendrix to the region. Its founder, Aubrey Eugene “Gene” Loving Jr., was a central figure in Virginia’s music scene, rising from a WLEE disc jockey to a well-known concert promoter and radio/TV personality. The more I looked through the collection, the more fascinated I became with the extremely cheap ticket prices from the 1960s and 1970s. As I looked at the $4 tickets, I wondered how we got to the point where two tickets to see Beyoncé cost me over $1100. 

When Beyoncé announced her tour for the Grammy Award–winning Cowboy Carter, I knew I couldn’t afford to miss it—even if I knew the cost would loom over the decision. Despite thousands of people ahead of me in the virtual queue—and my sister and I frantically texting back and forth about what we’d be willing to pay—I managed to secure two seats.  I won’t lie, I did cringe a bit when I saw the final cost of $1,131.86. Once inside the stadium, though, the excitement replaced the sticker shock. The seats I fought for offered us a view of everything. We weren’t seated too high or low; many would call them “production seats,” as we could see the stage and all of its effects in full. The show was 3 hours long, a stark contrast to the 1-hour shows artists of the past performed. As soon as Beyoncé started to perform, everything became worth it. My eyes were glued to the screens behind the stage. As expected, the show was better than anything I had hoped for —or even dreamed possible. The way Beyoncé performed made me understand why people were spending thousands to watch the same show over and over again. She hit the first note, and I was ready to swipe my credit card all over again. 

Enjoying a show like this as both a fan and a history lover made me reflect on how concerts have evolved. The thrill of the performance made the high price feel justified, but it also reminded me how far we’ve come from the simplicity of earlier decades. That shift—from intimate, affordable shows to large-scale productions—adds an interesting layer to the comparison between past and present concert culture.

women buying bread tickets005
Fans at the box office buying tickets to the Bread concert  

When older generations talk about the late ’60s and ’70s, they often describe them as simpler, almost idyllic times. From bold fashion to roller skates, they seemed to have it all—but most will argue that the best part was the music. Cheap concert tickets made it even better. Back then, people could simply show up at the box office the day of a show and walk away with seats, something nearly unthinkable today. While box offices still exist, they’re usually a last hope rather than a first option, and most people leave empty-handed. The best-case scenario is managing to find an open box office; the worst is waiting in line for nothing. Even when tickets are available, success depends heavily on the artist’s popularity. For smaller artists, it’s possible; for bigger ones, it often means camping out overnight—only to still leave without tickets. The risk of buying tickets at the box office is higher than it once was, and so are the prices. 

The best chance of getting tickets today is through online ticketing sites, which often have multiple fees. Despite the ease of buying tickets from the comfort of your own home, the joy is immediately taken away once you see the additional $80 service fee added to your total ticket price. Those who wanted to see bigger artists in the ’60s and ’70s weren’t paying nearly as much as the service fees or taxes added to tickets today. A Jackson Five ticket in 1971 cost a maximum $6, which is about $48.12 today. For a household name, that price is unimaginable now.

Bread Concert Crowd Shot
Bread performing at the Hampton Coliseum

So why does it feel like concert tickets keep getting more expensive? A major factor is how today’s artists are perceived in an age of constant access.While statistics may lead people today to believe that their favorite artists are known more worldwide than those from the past who are considered household names, access to music today versus in the 60s and 70s plays a huge role. The ability to discover new music today is incomparable to past decades. Listeners no longer need to buy a CD, record, or cassette. Everything is instantly accessible through apps. The price of a full-album vinyl record in the 1960s was an average of $0.99, which is way cheaper than the $20 or $30+ we see today for the same thing. While that may have been worth it then, today that .99 cents is worth around $11, which is the average price of a music streaming service. With that, you’re not just getting a single album; you’re getting thousands that you can listen to whenever, as long as the bill is paid. Even those who don’t want to pay for music have more access to music than in the past, thanks to free versions of music streaming apps. While that may explain the higher ticket sales and streaming numbers, it doesn’t fully explain the dramatic increase in concert length.

Most concerts today average about 1.5 hours, but top artists like Beyoncé and Taylor Swift regularly perform for three. Some credit this to their long careers and to the desire to give fans something meaningful in return for decades of support. Many artists also want to build immersive, conceptual shows that serve as the final expression of an album, and Beyoncé’s Cowboy Carter tour is a perfect example. A few moments from the show stuck with me, especially as a history major. The visual narrative was immersive, though I know some struggled with the aesthetic she embraced. From the beginning, it was clear that Beyoncé intended to reclaim country music—a genre pioneered by Black artists yet one that often excludes them today. With that came the American flags and bald eagles commonly associated with the genre, which lost a few people. Then she performed the “Star-Spangled Banner,” a moment that ruffled feathers even further. What many didn’t realize was that she sang Jimi Hendrix’s 1969 Woodstock rendition, widely viewed as an anti-war statement during the Vietnam era. Beyoncé’s version sounded haunted and eerie, shifting the atmosphere entirely. After she finished, she walked offstage as a message appeared on the screen: “Never ask permission for something that already belongs to you.” That sentiment encapsulated the album’s entire theme of reclamation. Moments like these, paired with nearly hour-long albums, openers, interludes, and songs from past projects, naturally stretch today’s biggest shows to three hours. Advancements in technology also keep audiences entertained during breaks through cinematic interludes, eliminating the downtime that once shortened shows. All of these elements—longer sets, elaborate visuals, and high-tech production—make modern concerts far more expensive to produce, a cost that inevitably gets passed on to fans in the form of higher ticket prices.

The Searchers Fan Poster
Fans holding up signs at The Searchers concert

Today, concert culture is different in many ways from what it was in the late ’60s and ’70s. While we still see super fans who are willing to travel great distances to see their favorite artists, the number of shows people are eager to travel to see is extreme. In the past, it wasn’t unusual for people to hop on a train or go on a road trip to see their favorite band at a music festival. In modern times, it’s quite similar to people catching flights to see their favorite artists perform, sometimes in multiple cities. Because artists now do fewer tour stops and concentrate on performances in major cities, many fans turn concert trips into mini-vacations. Many fans have admitted to choosing a tour date in a city with more to do rather than attend a concert closer to home. The reason being, if they’re going to travel to see the show anyway, why not go somewhere they’ve always wanted to visit? 

Beyond the cost of admission, today’s concertgoing experience comes with another expectation: dressing the part. Instead of showing up in everyday attire or formal wear like those in the ’60s and ’70s, fans are going all out. For Beyoncé’s two most recent tours, the Renaissance World Tour and Cowboy Carter and the Rodeo Chitlin’ Circuit, fans were seen dressed to the nines. Everywhere you looked, there was someone dressed in futuristic silver outfits or cowboy attire. It’s not uncommon for fans today to spend hundreds of dollars trying to emulate outfits worn by their favorite performer. During Taylor Swift’s The Eras Tour, it wasn’t rare to see fans bedazzling a bodysuit they saw her wear or talking about how much they spent on one that’s similar to hers. No matter the artist, fans routinely invest as much as the cost of another ticket just to capture the look and spirit of the show.

The Dome and Crowd
People attending a concert at the original Dome in Virginia Beach

Viewing the Gene Loving Collection during my internship with Old Dominion Special Collections and University Archives gave me a new perspective on how concerts and ticket prices have changed over the years. From the intimate shows of the ’60s and ’70s to today’s elaborate productions, it’s clear that while the scale, cost, and spectacle have grown, the passion of fans has remained constant. Seeing that a Jimi Hendrix ticket in 1968 cost just $4.50 sparked my curiosity about what it felt like to experience concerts back then. Luckily, I was able to ask my dad, who was born in 1959, about buying tickets and seeing shows at that price. The conversation started with me exasperatedly joking about how people got to see Michael Jackson for $30 and then my mom made a comment that made me realize my dad had actually seen Michael Jackson without ever mentioning it to me! He saw the Jackson Five in 1974 at the MECCA for $7.50 (about $49 today), and noted, “You don’t know how good you have it until it’s gone,” a sentiment I’m sure many who experienced ticket prices in the late ’60s and ’70s share. Despite the steady rise in ticket prices, fans across generations still seem to agree: when the music truly matters, the experience is priceless, and the devotion to live music remains unchanged.

Links: